Automated Proofreading Report  

Overview & Claims

Title:CATV DIGITAL RECEIVER INTERMODULATION SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTER MODULE
Document Name/Date: Sample_Application2.docx
Generated on October 03, 2023, 11:34 AM
Stats: Abstract: 250/150 words
Title: 68/500 chars
Claims (indep/total pending): 2/13

Claim tree and searchable claim table are shown below (without amended deletions). You can resize columns by dragging the hatched pattern in the column header to either left or right.
Claims Hierarchy Claim Text
Color legend for claim types:Method , Apparatus, Composition,Article, Means For, Product, Jepson.
Only show independent claims
ClaimTree Image
Indep. Claim
1. A method for testing susceptibility of a receiverx, the method comprising:

 

selecting a contour table from a plurality of channels in a composite signal;

 

determining the first power measurement from said first digital channel; and

 

determining the angled table to intermodulation distortion by comparing said first power measurement and said total power measurement with intermodulation distortion characteristics of said digital transceiver.
Yes
2.(Original) The method of Claim 1, wherein said receiver comprises a cable television(CATV) receiver.
No
3. The method of any of claim 1, wherein at least one of said first power measurement or said total power measurement is determined at an input of said receiver.
No
4. The method of any of claim 1, wherein at least one of said first power measurement or said total power measurement is determined at an input of said receiver.
No
5. The method of Claim 1, further comprising computing a relative power ratio between 0. 05 and 0. 06 degrees and said total power measurement.
No
6. The method of Claim 1, wherein said level-versus-frequency tilt of said composite signal is determined at an input of said receiver.
No
7. The method of Claim 6, further comprising compensating for a differing signal tilt when performing at least one of said first or total power measurements at a location different from a location of said receiver by utilizing said level-versus-frequency tilt.
No
8. The method of Claim 1, wherein said at least one other channel in said composite signal comprises at least one analog channel.
No
9. The method of Claim 1, wherein said at least one other channel in said composite signal comprises a plurality of analog channels.
No
11. The method of Claim 9, further comprising using said relative power ratio to predict the likelihood that other devices receiving said first digital channel would be impaired by internal intermodulation distortions.
No
12. The method of Claim 1, further comprising generating a tilt line for a plurality of channels in said composite signal to use as a reference power.
No
13. The method of Claim 12, further comprising outputting a susceptibility result for said first digital channel in accordance with said reference power so that a same test device will give a same susceptibility result at different points in a network having different tilts.
No
14. A system for testing susceptibility of a receiver, the system comprising:

 

selecting a contour table from a plurality of channels in a composite signal;

 

determining the first power measurement from said first digital channel; and

 

determining the angled table to intermodulation distortion by comparing said first power measurement and said total power measurement with intermodulation distortion characteristics of said digital transceiver.
Yes

Errors in Claims

Claims with errors or warnings are shown below (i.e., issues with claim numbering, amendments, status indicators, syntax, and style).
Claims Identified Issues
2.(Original) The method of Claim 1, wherein said receiver comprises a cable television(CATV) receiver.

Either the claim or its parent is missing a status indicator. If the claim has a status identifier, so should its parent (and vise-versa).

3. The method of any of claim 1, wherein at least one of said first power measurement or said total power measurement is determined at an input of said receiver.

1. Claim is amended, but its status identifier does not reflect the amendment. Change the claim's status identifier to the one that indicates a current amendment, such as (Currently Amended).

2. "or": Claim includes 'alternative' language which might render the claim broader than intended. Review the claim, as alternative phrases in claim limitations can render them broader than intended, leading to easier invalidity challenges.

4. The method of any of claim 1, wherein at least one of said first power measurement or said total power measurement is determined at an input of said receiver.

1. Claim is amended, but its status identifier does not reflect the amendment. Change the claim's status identifier to the one that indicates a current amendment, such as (Currently Amended).

2. "or": Claim includes 'alternative' language which might render the claim broader than intended. Review the claim, as alternative phrases in claim limitations can render them broader than intended, leading to easier invalidity challenges.

3. Detected dependent claims with the same scope: 4 and 3. Check claim scope/dependencies

7. The method of Claim 6, further comprising compensating for a differing signal tilt when performing at least one of said first or total power measurements at a location different from a location of said receiver by utilizing said level-versus-frequency tilt.

"or": Claim includes 'alternative' language which might render the claim broader than intended. Review the claim, as alternative phrases in claim limitations can render them broader than intended, leading to easier invalidity challenges.

11. The method of Claim 9, further comprising using said relative power ratio to predict the likelihood that other devices receiving said first digital channel would be impaired by internal intermodulation distortions.

Claim number is out of sequence. Make sure claims are numbered sequentially. See MPEP 608.01(j)

14. A system for testing susceptibility of a receiver, the system comprising:

 

selecting a contour table from a plurality of channels in a composite signal;

 

determining the first power measurement from said first digital channel; and

 

determining the angled table to intermodulation distortion by comparing said first power measurement and said total power measurement with intermodulation distortion characteristics of said digital transceiver.

"for testing": Functional limitations might be given too little or too much weight by the USPTO or the courts. Note that purely functional limitations might be given little weight by the USPTO/courts or used to invoke 'means or step plus function' limitations under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112 (6) paragraph. Consider revising using 'operable to' or similar language.

Antecedent Basis Errors

This tab shows Antecedent Basis ("AB") errors and warnings (i.e., missing AB, ambiguous definitions, possible singular/plural mismatches, limiting terms in the preamble). Hover or click on highlighted words to see suggestions in claims. To remove existing highlighting, click on any other word in the document. If the 'Hide claims with unrelated dependencies ...' checkbox is selected, only claims belonging to the same top independent claim will be shown during term searching. 

  Hide claims with unrelated dependencies when performing term searches
1. A method for testing susceptibility of a receiverx, the method comprising:

 

selecting a contour table from a plurality of channels in a composite signal;

 

determining the first power measurement from said first digital channel;

 

and determining the angled table to intermodulation distortion by comparing said first power measurement and said total power measurement with intermodulation distortion characteristics of said digital transceiver .
A
2. ( Original ) The method of Claim 1, wherein said receiver comprises a cable television (CATV)receiver .
A
3. The method of any of claim 1, wherein at least one of said first power measurement or said total power measurement is determined at an input of said receiver .
A
4. The method of any of claim 1, wherein at least one of said first power measurement or said total power measurement is determined at an input of said receiver .
A
5 . The method of Claim 1, further comprising computing a relative power ratio between 0. 05 and 0. 06 degrees and said total power measurement .
A
6 . The method of Claim 1, wherein said level - versus - frequency tilt of said composite signal is determined at an input of said receiver .
A
7. The method of Claim 6, further comprising compensating for a differing signal tilt when performing at least one of said first or total power measurements at a location different from a location of said receiver by utilizing said level - versus - frequency tilt .
A
8 . The method of Claim 1, wherein said at least one other channel in said composite signal comprises at least one analog channel .
A
9 . The method of Claim 1, wherein said at least one other channel in said composite signal comprises a plurality of analog channels .
A
11. The method of Claim 9, further comprising using said relative power ratio to predict the likelihood that other devices receiving said first digital channel would be impaired by internal intermodulation distortions .
A
12. The method of Claim 1, further comprising generating a tilt line for a plurality of channels in said composite signal to use as a reference power .
A
13. The method of Claim 12, further comprising outputting a susceptibility result for said first digital channel in accordance with said reference power so that a same test device will give a same susceptibility result at different points in a network having different tilts .
A
14. A system for testing susceptibility of a receiver, the system comprising:

 

selecting a contour table from a plurality of channels in a composite signal;

 

determining the first power measurement from said first digital channel;

 

and determining the angled table to intermodulation distortion by comparing said first power measurement and said total power measurement with intermodulation distortion characteristics of said digital transceiver .
B

Word Support in Specification

This tab shows whether individual claim words appear in the specification. Words that were not found in the Detailed Description are underlined in red. Certain function words, such as prepositions, are not checked. Hover over each green/yellow word to see how often this word and its variants appear in the specification.  
Claims Specification
1 . A method for testing susceptibility of a receiverx, the method comprising:

 

selecting a contour table from a plurality of channels in a composite signal;

 

determining the first power measurement from said first digital channel; and

 

determining the angled table to intermodulation distortion by comparing said first power measurement and said total power measurement with intermodulation distortion characteristics of said digital transceiver .
2 . (Original)The method of Claim 1, wherein said receiver comprises a cable television (CATV)receiver .
3 . The method of any of claim 1, wherein at least one of said first power measurement or said total power measurement is determined at an input of said receiver .
4 . The method of any of claim 1, wherein at least one of said first power measurement or said total power measurement is determined at an input of said receiver .
5 . The method of Claim 1, further comprising computing a relative power ratio between 0 . 05 and 0 . 06 degrees and said total power measurement .
6 . The method of Claim 1, wherein said level-versus-frequency tilt of said composite signal is determined at an input of said receiver .
7 . The method of Claim 6, further comprising compensating for a differing signal tilt when performing at least one of said first or total power measurements at a location different from a location of said receiver by utilizing said level-versus-frequency tilt .
8 . The method of Claim 1, wherein said at least one other channel in said composite signal comprises at least one analog channel .
9 . The method of Claim 1, wherein said at least one other channel in said composite signal comprises a plurality of analog channels .
11 . The method of Claim 9, further comprising using said relative power ratio to predict the likelihood that other devices receiving said first digital channel would be impaired by internal intermodulation distortions .
12 . The method of Claim 1, further comprising generating a tilt line for a plurality of channels in said composite signal to use as a reference power .
13 . The method of Claim 12, further comprising outputting a susceptibility result for said first digital channel in accordance with said reference power so that a same test device will give a same susceptibility result at different points in a network having different tilts .
14 . A system for testing susceptibility of a receiver, the system comprising:

 

selecting a contour table from a plurality of channels in a composite signal;

 

determining the first power measurement from said first digital channel; and

 

determining the angled table to intermodulation distortion by comparing said first power measurement and said total power measurement with intermodulation distortion characteristics of said digital transceiver .
CATV DIGITAL RECEIVER INTERMODULATION SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTER MODULE
BACKGROUND
[0001]The present invention relates to cable television (CATV) receivers. More particularly, the present invention relates to a method and apparatus for measuring the susceptibility to intermodulation distortion of digital CATV receivers.
[0002]Intermodulation distortion generally occurs in a digital receiver, such as a cable modem or set-top box, when the total power of all signals input to the receiver is too high relative to the power of the digital signal desired to be demodulated. However, if the relative power level of the desired digital channel could be increased, the receiver might attenuate all incoming signals and substantially stop the intermodulation distortion from occurring.
[0003]When intermodulation distortion occurs, the receiver must decode errors that are not caused by impairments within the digital channel. Existing test instruments always measure the bit error rate caused by impairments within a digital channel, but not those caused by intermodulation distortions generated within the receiver, such as a cable modem, set-top box, or other consumer-grade receiver. Test instrument receivers may be capable of rejecting relatively high signal amplitude levels that fall outside of the particular frequency range of the digital channel being measured. On the other hand, the receivers used in consumer-grade equipment are typically not so capable. Thus, the test instruments are unable to measure or accurately estimate bit errors caused by intermodulation distortion at a consumer-grade receiver. Therefore, such test instruments will generally fail to report problems that cause impairments in consumer-grade equipment.
[0004]Unfortunately, the difference in amplitude levels between the lowest and highest frequencies carried on a cable is typically not a constant value. A coaxial cable, for example, attenuates higher frequencies. This effect is known as tilt. In order to compensate for attenuation, amplifiers are used to boost the overall signal power. Equalizers may be used in conjunction with the amplifiers so that the net signal boost is greater for higher frequencies, thereby reducing the tilt.
[0005]These and other issues are addressed by a method and apparatus for testing susceptibility of a receiver to intermodulation distortion of a digital channel. Exemplary embodiments are provided.
[0006]An exemplary method of the present disclosure includes selecting a first digital channel from a plurality of channels in a composite signal, determining a first power measurement from said first digital channel, determining a total power measurement from at least one other channel in said composite signal, and determining susceptibility of said first digital channel to intermodulation distortion by comparing said first power measurement and said total power measurement with intermodulation distortion characteristics of said receiver.
[0007]Another exemplary method is provided wherein said receiver comprises a cable television (CATV) receiver. Another exemplary method is provided wherein said first digital channel and said at least one other channel comprise video channels. Yet another exemplary method is provided wherein at least one of said first power measurement or said total power measurement is determined at an input of said receiver.
[0008]Another exemplary method is provided, further comprising determining a level-versus-frequency tilt of said composite signal. Another exemplary method is provided wherein said level-versus-frequency tilt of said composite signal is determined at an input of said receiver. Yet another exemplary method is provided, further comprising compensating for a differing signal tilt when performing at least one of said first or total power measurements at a location different from a location of said receiver by utilizing said level-versus-frequency tilt.
[0009]Another exemplary method is provided wherein said at least one other channel in said composite signal comprises at least one analog channel. Yet another exemplary method is provided wherein said at least one other channel in said composite signal comprises a plurality of analog channels.
[0010]Another exemplary method is provided, further comprising computing a relative power ratio between said first power measurement and said total power measurement. Yet another exemplary method is provided, further comprising using said relative power ratio to predict the likelihood that other devices receiving said first digital channel will be impaired by internal intermodulation distortions.
[0011]Another exemplary method is provided, further comprising generating a tilt line for a plurality of channels in said composite signal to use as a reference power. Yet another exemplary method is provided, further comprising outputting a susceptibility result for said first digital channel in accordance with said reference power so that a same test device will give a same susceptibility result at different points in a network having different tilts.
[0012]An exemplary intermodulation test device is provided for testing susceptibility of a receiver to intermodulation distortion of a digital channel, the device comprising a tuner for selecting a first digital channel from a plurality of channels in a composite signal, a detector in signal communication with the tuner for determining a first power measurement from said first digital channel and determining a total power measurement from at least one other channel in said composite signal, and a controller in signal communication with the detector for determining susceptibility of said first digital channel to intermodulation distortion by comparing said first power measurement and said total power measurement with intermodulation distortion characteristics of said receiver.
[0013]Another exemplary device is provided, further comprising a display in signal communication with the controller for outputting a result indicative of the determined susceptibility of said first digital channel to intermodulation distortion. Yet another exemplary method is provided, the controller comprising a channel selection unit, a channel plan unit, a digital channel measurement unit in signal communication with the channel selection unit and the channel plan unit, another channel measurement unit in signal communication with the channel plan unit, an evaluation unit in signal communication with the digital channel measurement unit, and a results unit in signal communication with the evaluation unit.
[0014]Another exemplary device is provided wherein the evaluation unit is further in signal communication with the other channel measurement unit. Another exemplary device is provided, further comprising a configurable limit unit in signal communication with the evaluation unit. Yet another exemplary device is provided, further comprising a device specification database in signal communication with the evaluation unit.
[0015]Another exemplary device is provided, further comprising a tilt calculator in signal communication with the other channel measurement unit, a tilt reference unit in signal communication with the tilt calculator, and a tilt compensator in signal communication with each of the digital channel measurement unit and the other channel measurement unit, wherein the evaluation unit is in signal communication with both the digital channel measurement unit and the tilt compensator.
[0016]The present disclosure will be further understood from the following description of exemplary embodiments, which is to be read in connection with the accompanying drawings.
[0017]The present disclosure will be described in greater detail with reference to the accompanying drawings, which represent exemplary embodiments thereof, in which:
[0018]Figure 1 is a schematic diagram of an intermodulation testing device in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure;
[0019]Figures 2-4 are a functional diagram of a controller for the testing device of Figure 1 in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure;
[0020]Figure 5 is a graphical diagram of measured powers of analog channels in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure; and
[0021]Figure 6 is a flow diagram for a method of intermodulation susceptibility testing device in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0022]The present disclosure provides a method and apparatus for testing the likelihood that a receiver will be impaired by internal intermodulation (IM) distortions as a result of the power distribution across the channels within the received signal. Preferred embodiments measure the signals present on a cable rather than those present within a digital receiver. The IM distortion itself is generated within a digital receiver when adverse signal conditions are present. Such adverse signal conditions may include power relative to the desired signal at frequencies above and/or below the frequency band containing the desired signal, for example.
[0023]An exemplary embodiment measures the susceptibilities of cable television (CATV) digital receivers to IM distortion. Exemplary embodiments operate by analyzing signal levels to be input to the receivers, either at the receivers or at known or estimated cable lengths upstream from the receivers. Embodiments may compare the highest analog channel amplitude to the lowest digital channel amplitude, compensate for the inherent tilt of typical coaxial cables, evaluate a user-selected channel, or reference tilt and power.
[0024]A system embodiment measures and reports the signal conditions on a CATV network that can cause intermodulation distortions to occur in consumer-grade digital receivers, enabling technicians to identify and correct the problem. The presently disclosed testing device is capable of measuring the tilt at the point of measurement and compensating for the tilt when it computes the susceptibility to intermodulation distortion. The device may be used to evaluate a single digital channel or scan all digital channels and measure the one with the greatest susceptibility to intermodulation distortion, for example.
[0025]As shown in Figure 2, an intermodulation testing device is indicated generally by the network 1000000a. The tester module 100 includes a controller 110, a frequency (RF) tuner 120 connected to the controller, a detector 130 connected to both the controller and the tuner, and a display 140 connected to the controller. The RF tuner 120 is capable of tuning to any channel being broadcast on the CATV network. The detector 130 may include one or more appropriate detectors for measuring the power of analog and/or digital TV channels. The controller 110 may include non-volatile memory for storing both an operating program and configuration data. The display 140 may be as simple as an indicator light or as elaborate as a touch screen for configuring the device, selecting channels, and reporting measurement progress and results.
[0026]controller 110 digital channel measurement block 312 device specification database 322
[0027]Turning to Figure 2A, a method executable by the controller 110 of Figure 1 is indicated generally by the channel 200. The method 200 includes a channel selection block 210, which passes control to a digital channel measurement block 212. The digital channel measurement block receives a channel plan 214, which contains a description of the channels being transmitted on the cable, including frequency and modulation type The digital channel measurement block 212 measures the power of a selected digital channel. For example, one method of measuring the digital channel power is known in the art as Digicheck. Another less accurate method is to measure the power at the center frequency and add a bandwidth compensation factor based on the ratio of digital channel bandwidth to measurement bandwidth. The digital channel measurement block 212 may perform the power measurement periodically in order to update the display with current results.
[0028]
[0029]Another channel measurement block 216 also receives the channel plan 214, and measures the power of all or a subset of the channels being transmitted. The other channel measurement block 216 may measure all the channels, or just those that could substantially contribute to intermodulation distortion. Such other measured channels could be the video carriers of the analog TV channels, for example, since they normally have the highest power. The other channel measurement block 216 may perform only one measurement for each channel, measure all of them periodically, or select a small number with the highest power and measure them periodically in order to update the display with current results.
[0030]An evaluation block 218 is connected to both the digital channel measurement block 212, for receiving measured channel power and frequency, and to the other channel measurement block 216, for receiving measured power versus frequency. The evaluation block 218 compares the power of the digital channel being tested to the power of the other channels and determines whether a device receiving the digital channel is susceptible to intermodulation distortions.
[0031]Different types of evaluations are possible in the evaluation block 218. In a first example, the evaluation block 218 may subtract the digital channel power from the highest of the other channels’ measured powers. If this result is over a threshold value or configurable limit 220, the channel is indicated as susceptible. The degree of susceptibility may be indicated by the amount that the difference exceeds the threshold. In a second example, the evaluation block 218 may sum the measured powers of the other channels to get a total integrated power, and then subtract the digital channel power from this sum.
[0032]As in the first example, the evaluation block compares the value to a threshold to evaluate the susceptibility to intermodulation distortions. In a third example, the evaluation block 218 may consider the capability of a tuner to reject off-frequency signals as a function of frequency or difference in frequency between the digital channel being received and the frequency of the other signal. Here, the evaluation block 218 sums the amount by which the power of any channel other than the digital channel being evaluated exceeds the device’s rejection capability. The sum of these is defined herein as the “total overload power”. As in the first example, the evaluation block compares this value to a threshold to evaluate the susceptibility to intermodulation distortions.Click or tap to enter a date.
digital channel measurement block 212 channel measurement block 216
[0033]In an alternate embodiment, the method may measure the powers of only those channels for which sums and differences of harmonic frequencies of two or three channels falls within the frequency band of the first digital channel. Here, composite second order (CSO) distortion is the sum or difference of two signals or their harmonics, and composite triple beat (CTB) distortion is the sum and/or difference of three signals or their harmonics.
[0034]The controller 110 or tester module 100 of Figure 1 may further evaluate the susceptibility of a single digital channel selected by the user. The tester module may also scan all digital channels and report the susceptibility of each. The tester module may report which channel is most susceptible and the particular susceptibility of only that channel. The TCP tester module may display or otherwise output a susceptibility report or result 224, which may be a pass/fail indicator and/or the degree of susceptibility, displayed either numerically or graphically. The tester module may evaluate susceptibility compared to a reference specification from a device specification database 222, which database may provide overload power versus frequency. The specification may be configurable. The tester module 100 may further contain a database of the susceptibility characteristics of various receiver devices. A user of the tester module could select a device from the database, and the tester module would report its susceptibility.
[0035]The susceptibility result 224 of this exemplary embodiment may be valid for devices connected at or near the same location as the tester nodule. The signal may have a different tilt at other locations.
[0036]Turning now to Figure 3, another method executable by the controller 110 of Figure 1 is indicated generally by the method 300. The method 300 is similar to the system 200; so duplicate description shall be omitted. The method 300 includes extra functional blocks to perform tilt compensation, such as to measure susceptibility at other locations distant from the location of the tester nodule 100.
[0037]The method 300 includes a channel selection block 310, which passes control to a digital channel measurement block 312. The digital channel measurement block receives a channel plan 314. The digital channel measurement block 312 measures the power of a selected digital channel. Another channel measurement block 316 also receives the channel plan 314, and measures the power of at least some of the other channels being transmitted.
[0038]A tilt calculator 326 is connected to the other channel measurement block 316, and provides a tilt reference 330. A tilt compensator 328 is connected to each of the digital channel measurement block 312, the other channel measurement block 316, and the tilt calculator 326 for receiving a current tilt value.
[0039]An evaluation block 318 is connected to both the digital channel measurement block 312 and the tilt compensator 328 for receiving compensated power of other channels. The evaluation block 318 may receive a limit specification or threshold 320 and/or information from a device specification database 322. The evaluation block 318 compares the power and/or compensated power of the digital channel being tested to the compensated powers of the other channels, determines whether a device receiving the digital channel is susceptible to intermodulation distortions, and outputs a corresponding result 324.
[0040]As shown in Figure 4, a plot of measured powers of analog TV channels is generally indicated. The plot 400 includes measured analog signal powers 412, 414, 416, 418, 420, 422, 424, 426, 428, 430, 432, 434, 436 and 438, each at a different carrier frequency. Here, a first frequency span S1 includes the measured powers 412, 414, 416 and 418. A second frequency span S2 includes the measured powers 418, 420, 422, 424, 426 and 428; and a third frequency span S3 includes the measured powers 428, 430, 432, 434 and 436. The tilt calculator 326 of Figure 3 may use these measured powers to compute a slope of a tilt line. A tilt line is a straight line intersecting the measured levels of two of the highest channels such that all other channels have less than or equal to the power at that frequency on the tilt line.
[0041]In the exemplary plot 400, tilt lines L1, L2 and L3 are present. If two or more possible tilt lines are found, exemplary plot 400, the one covering the widest frequency span is used. From the three possible tilt lines, L2 is selected over L1 and L3 because it has the widest frequency span S2. If two or more tilt lines are found having equal frequency spans, the one with less tilt is used. The tilt calculator 326 outputs the slope of the tilt line, but need not calculate nor output the y-intercept.
[0042]A user may assume that the signal has no tilt at the point that subscriber equipment is connected. Alternatively, the user may use the device to measure the actual tilt at the subscriber location. If the actual tilt is used, the device may store it as a reference tilt. If known, the reference tilt value may also be entered into the device without performing a tilt measurement.
[0043]When tilt compensation is used, the device first measures the tilt. It uses the difference between the current tilt and the reference tilt to adjust the measured powers of all channels. The amount of adjustment is given by the equation:
tiltComp(freq) = (refTilt – currentTilt) * (freq – digFreq) (Equation 1)
[0044]In Equation 1, currentTilt is the measured tilt at the current location, refTilt is the tilt at the location of the subscriber’s receiver, freq is the frequency of the channel being adjusted, and digFreq is the frequency of the digital channel for which susceptibility is being evaluated. The adjustment is added to the measured value before passing it on to the evaluation block 318.
[0045]Turning to Figure 5, a method for assessing susceptibility of a CATV receiver to intermodulation distortion is indicated generally by the reference numeral 500. The method 500 includes a start block 510, which passes control to a function block 512. The function block 512 selects a first digital channel from a plurality of channels in a CATV signal, and passes control to a function block 514. The function block 514 determines a first power measurement of the first digital channel at the CATV receiver input, and passes control to a function block 516. The function block 516 determines a total power measurement from one or more of the other channels in the CATV signal at the CATV receiver input, and passes control to a function block 518. The function block 518, in turn, determines the susceptibility of the first digital channel to intermodulation distortion by comparing the first and total power measurements with known intermodulation distortion characteristics of the CATV receiver.
[0001]Turning to Figure 10, a method for assessing susceptibility of a CATV receiver to intermodulation distortion is indicated generally by the reference numeral 1000. The method 1000 includes a start block 1010a, which passes control to a function block 1012b. The function block 1012 selects a first digital channel from a plurality of channels in a CATV signal, and passes control to a function block 1014c. The function block 1014 determines a first power measurement of the first digital channel at the CATV receiver input, and passes control to a function block 1016. The function block 1016d determines a total power measurement from one or more of the other channels in the CATV signal at the CATV receiver input, and passes control to a function block 1018. Optionally, the method 1000 may further include a function block 1020, which receives control from the function block 1018 and determines a level-versus-frequency signal tilt at the CATV receiver input. In addition, the method 1000 may further include a function block 1022, which receives control from the function block 1020 and uses the level-versus-frequency signal tilt measured at the CATV receiver input to compensate for the differing signal tilt when performing the signal power measurements at a location in the network other than at the original CATV receiver input. The function block 1022 may then pass control to an end block 1024.
[0002]The above and alternate embodiments provide a method and apparatus for measuring and analyzing the signals present at the input of a CATV digital receiver, and thereby determining its susceptibility to intermodulation (IM) distortion. The IM distortion results when the total power received across all digital and analog signal frequencies exceeds by a critical amount the strength of the selected digital signal being demodulated. Technicians can use this diagnostic tool to measure a single digital channel and/or scan all digital channels, and pursue appropriate corrective action for instances in which susceptibility to IM distortion is indicated. Embodiments may also use a level-versus-frequency signal tilt compensation feature, which enables a tester module 100 to evaluate a receiver connected at a different location in the network from that of the tester module.
[0003]Preferred embodiments of the test device 100 of Figure 1 may use a range of 0.05 to 0.06 relative power ratio between the analog video channels and a digital channel in order to predict the likelihood that other devices receiving that digital channel will be impaired by internal intermodulations. Such other devices may be of different types, each having unique specifications stored in a device specification database 322, for example. A tester module 100 may further generate a tilt line for use as the reference power so that the same device will give the same results at different points in the network that have different tilts.
[0004]Although illustrative embodiments have been described herein with reference to the accompanying drawings, it is to be understood that the present disclosure is not limited to those precise embodiments, and that various other changes and modifications may be effected therein by those of ordinary skill in the receiver123 art without departing from the scope or spirit of the present disclosure. All such changes and modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the present disclosure as set forth in the appended claims.
CLAIMS
ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
A method and apparatus are provided for of a receiver to intermodulation distortion of a digital channel, the method including selecting a first digital channel from channels in a composite signal, determining a first power measurement from the first digital channel, determining a total power measurement from other channels in the composite signal, and determining susceptibility of the first digital channel to intermodulation distortion by comparing the first power measurement and the total power measurement with intermodulation distortion characteristics of the receiver. A method and apparatus are provided for testing susceptibility of a receiver to intermodulation distortion of a digital channel, the method including selecting a first digital channel from channels in a composite signal, determining a first power measurement from the first digital channel, determining a. A method and apparatus are provided for testing susceptibility of a receiver to intermodulation distortion of a digital channel, the method including selecting a first digital channel from channels in a composite signal, determining a first power measurement from the first digital channel, determining a total power measurement from other channels in the composite signal, and determining susceptibility of the first digital channel to intermodulation distortion by comparing the first power measurement and the total power measurement with intermodulation distortion characteristics of the receiver total power measurement from other channels in the composite signal, and determining susceptibility of the first digital channel to intermodulation distortion by comparing the first power measurement and the total power measurement with intermodulation distortion characteristics of the receiver.

Phrase Support in Specification

This tab shows whether phrases from claims appear in the specification. Phrases that were not found in the Detailed Description are underlined in red. Hover over each green/yellow phrase to see how frequently it appears in the specification. Select any text region with a mouse to search for it in the specification. 
Claims Specification
1 . A method for testing susceptibility of a receiverx, the method comprising:

 

selecting a contour table from a plurality of channels in a composite signal;

 

determining the first power measurement from said first digital channel; and

 

determining the angled table to intermodulation distortion by comparing said first power measurement and said total power measurement with intermodulation distortion characteristics of said digital transceiver .
2 . (Original)The method of Claim 1, wherein said receiver comprises a cable television (catv)receiver .
3 . The method of any of claim 1, wherein at least one of said first power measurement or said total power measurement is determined at an input of said receiver .
4 . The method of any of claim 1, wherein at least one of said first power measurement or said total power measurement is determined at an input of said receiver .
5 . The method of Claim 1, further comprising computing a relative power ratio between 0 . 05 and 0 . 06 degrees and said total power measurement .
6 . The method of Claim 1, wherein said level-versus-frequency tilt of said composite signal is determined at an input of said receiver .
7 . The method of Claim 6, further comprising compensating for a differing signal tilt when performing at least one of said first or total power measurements at a location different from a location of said receiver by utilizing said level-versus-frequency tilt .
8 . The method of Claim 1, wherein said at least one other channel in said composite signal comprises at least one analog channel .
9 . The method of Claim 1, wherein said at least one other channel in said composite signal comprises a plurality of analog channels .
11 . The method of Claim 9, further comprising using said relative power ratio to predict the likelihood that other devices receiving said first digital channel would be impaired by internal intermodulation distortions .
12 . The method of Claim 1, further comprising generating a tilt line for a plurality of channels in said composite signal to use as a reference power .
13 . The method of Claim 12, further comprising outputting a susceptibility result for said first digital channel in accordance with said reference power so that a same test device will give a same susceptibility result at different points in a network having different tilts .
14 . A system for testing susceptibility of a receiver, the system comprising:

 

selecting a contour table from a plurality of channels in a composite signal;

 

determining the first power measurement from said first digital channel; and

 

determining the angled table to intermodulation distortion by comparing said first power measurement and said total power measurement with intermodulation distortion characteristics of said digital transceiver .
CATV DIGITAL RECEIVER INTERMODULATION SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTER MODULE
BACKGROUND
[0001]The present invention relates to cable television (CATV) receivers. More particularly, the present invention relates to a method and apparatus for measuring the susceptibility to intermodulation distortion of digital CATV receivers.
[0002]Intermodulation distortion generally occurs in a digital receiver, such as a cable modem or set-top box, when the total power of all signals input to the receiver is too high relative to the power of the digital signal desired to be demodulated. However, if the relative power level of the desired digital channel could be increased, the receiver might attenuate all incoming signals and substantially stop the intermodulation distortion from occurring.
[0003]When intermodulation distortion occurs, the receiver must decode errors that are not caused by impairments within the digital channel. Existing test instruments always measure the bit error rate caused by impairments within a digital channel, but not those caused by intermodulation distortions generated within the receiver, such as a cable modem, set-top box, or other consumer-grade receiver. Test instrument receivers may be capable of rejecting relatively high signal amplitude levels that fall outside of the particular frequency range of the digital channel being measured. On the other hand, the receivers used in consumer-grade equipment are typically not so capable. Thus, the test instruments are unable to measure or accurately estimate bit errors caused by intermodulation distortion at a consumer-grade receiver. Therefore, such test instruments will generally fail to report problems that cause impairments in consumer-grade equipment.
[0004]Unfortunately, the difference in amplitude levels between the lowest and highest frequencies carried on a cable is typically not a constant value. A coaxial cable, for example, attenuates higher frequencies. This effect is known as tilt. In order to compensate for attenuation, amplifiers are used to boost the overall signal power. Equalizers may be used in conjunction with the amplifiers so that the net signal boost is greater for higher frequencies, thereby reducing the tilt.
[0005]These and other issues are addressed by a method and apparatus for testing susceptibility of a receiver to intermodulation distortion of a digital channel. Exemplary embodiments are provided.
[0006]An exemplary method of the present disclosure includes selecting a first digital channel from a plurality of channels in a composite signal, determining a first power measurement from said first digital channel, determining a total power measurement from at least one other channel in said composite signal, and determining susceptibility of said first digital channel to intermodulation distortion by comparing said first power measurement and said total power measurement with intermodulation distortion characteristics of said receiver.
[0007]Another exemplary method is provided wherein said receiver comprises a cable television (CATV) receiver. Another exemplary method is provided wherein said first digital channel and said at least one other channel comprise video channels. Yet another exemplary method is provided wherein at least one of said first power measurement or said total power measurement is determined at an input of said receiver.
[0008]Another exemplary method is provided, further comprising determining a level-versus-frequency tilt of said composite signal. Another exemplary method is provided wherein said level-versus-frequency tilt of said composite signal is determined at an input of said receiver. Yet another exemplary method is provided, further comprising compensating for a differing signal tilt when performing at least one of said first or total power measurements at a location different from a location of said receiver by utilizing said level-versus-frequency tilt.
[0009]Another exemplary method is provided wherein said at least one other channel in said composite signal comprises at least one analog channel. Yet another exemplary method is provided wherein said at least one other channel in said composite signal comprises a plurality of analog channels.
[0010]Another exemplary method is provided, further comprising computing a relative power ratio between said first power measurement and said total power measurement. Yet another exemplary method is provided, further comprising using said relative power ratio to predict the likelihood that other devices receiving said first digital channel will be impaired by internal intermodulation distortions.
[0011]Another exemplary method is provided, further comprising generating a tilt line for a plurality of channels in said composite signal to use as a reference power. Yet another exemplary method is provided, further comprising outputting a susceptibility result for said first digital channel in accordance with said reference power so that a same test device will give a same susceptibility result at different points in a network having different tilts.
[0012]An exemplary intermodulation test device is provided for testing susceptibility of a receiver to intermodulation distortion of a digital channel, the device comprising a tuner for selecting a first digital channel from a plurality of channels in a composite signal, a detector in signal communication with the tuner for determining a first power measurement from said first digital channel and determining a total power measurement from at least one other channel in said composite signal, and a controller in signal communication with the detector for determining susceptibility of said first digital channel to intermodulation distortion by comparing said first power measurement and said total power measurement with intermodulation distortion characteristics of said receiver.
[0013]Another exemplary device is provided, further comprising a display in signal communication with the controller for outputting a result indicative of the determined susceptibility of said first digital channel to intermodulation distortion. Yet another exemplary method is provided, the controller comprising a channel selection unit, a channel plan unit, a digital channel measurement unit in signal communication with the channel selection unit and the channel plan unit, another channel measurement unit in signal communication with the channel plan unit, an evaluation unit in signal communication with the digital channel measurement unit, and a results unit in signal communication with the evaluation unit.
[0014]Another exemplary device is provided wherein the evaluation unit is further in signal communication with the other channel measurement unit. Another exemplary device is provided, further comprising a configurable limit unit in signal communication with the evaluation unit. Yet another exemplary device is provided, further comprising a device specification database in signal communication with the evaluation unit.
[0015]Another exemplary device is provided, further comprising a tilt calculator in signal communication with the other channel measurement unit, a tilt reference unit in signal communication with the tilt calculator, and a tilt compensator in signal communication with each of the digital channel measurement unit and the other channel measurement unit, wherein the evaluation unit is in signal communication with both the digital channel measurement unit and the tilt compensator.
[0016]The present disclosure will be further understood from the following description of exemplary embodiments, which is to be read in connection with the accompanying drawings.
[0017]The present disclosure will be described in greater detail with reference to the accompanying drawings, which represent exemplary embodiments thereof, in which:
[0018]Figure 1 is a schematic diagram of an intermodulation testing device in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure;
[0019]Figures 2-4 are a functional diagram of a controller for the testing device of Figure 1 in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure;
[0020]Figure 5 is a graphical diagram of measured powers of analog channels in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure; and
[0021]Figure 6 is a flow diagram for a method of intermodulation susceptibility testing device in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0022]The present disclosure provides a method and apparatus for testing the likelihood that a receiver will be impaired by internal intermodulation (IM) distortions as a result of the power distribution across the channels within the received signal. Preferred embodiments measure the signals present on a cable rather than those present within a digital receiver. The IM distortion itself is generated within a digital receiver when adverse signal conditions are present. Such adverse signal conditions may include power relative to the desired signal at frequencies above and/or below the frequency band containing the desired signal, for example.
[0023]An exemplary embodiment measures the susceptibilities of cable television (CATV) digital receivers to IM distortion. Exemplary embodiments operate by analyzing signal levels to be input to the receivers, either at the receivers or at known or estimated cable lengths upstream from the receivers. Embodiments may compare the highest analog channel amplitude to the lowest digital channel amplitude, compensate for the inherent tilt of typical coaxial cables, evaluate a user-selected channel, or reference tilt and power.
[0024]A system embodiment measures and reports the signal conditions on a CATV network that can cause intermodulation distortions to occur in consumer-grade digital receivers, enabling technicians to identify and correct the problem. The presently disclosed testing device is capable of measuring the tilt at the point of measurement and compensating for the tilt when it computes the susceptibility to intermodulation distortion. The device may be used to evaluate a single digital channel or scan all digital channels and measure the one with the greatest susceptibility to intermodulation distortion, for example.
[0025]As shown in Figure 2, an intermodulation testing device is indicated generally by the network 1000000a. The tester module 100 includes a controller 110, a frequency (RF) tuner 120 connected to the controller, a detector 130 connected to both the controller and the tuner, and a display 140 connected to the controller. The RF tuner 120 is capable of tuning to any channel being broadcast on the CATV network. The detector 130 may include one or more appropriate detectors for measuring the power of analog and/or digital TV channels. The controller 110 may include non-volatile memory for storing both an operating program and configuration data. The display 140 may be as simple as an indicator light or as elaborate as a touch screen for configuring the device, selecting channels, and reporting measurement progress and results.
[0026]controller 110 digital channel measurement block 312 device specification database 322
[0027]Turning to Figure 2A, a method executable by the controller 110 of Figure 1 is indicated generally by the channel 200. The method 200 includes a channel selection block 210, which passes control to a digital channel measurement block 212. The digital channel measurement block receives a channel plan 214, which contains a description of the channels being transmitted on the cable, including frequency and modulation type The digital channel measurement block 212 measures the power of a selected digital channel. For example, one method of measuring the digital channel power is known in the art as Digicheck. Another less accurate method is to measure the power at the center frequency and add a bandwidth compensation factor based on the ratio of digital channel bandwidth to measurement bandwidth. The digital channel measurement block 212 may perform the power measurement periodically in order to update the display with current results.
[0028]
[0029]Another channel measurement block 216 also receives the channel plan 214, and measures the power of all or a subset of the channels being transmitted. The other channel measurement block 216 may measure all the channels, or just those that could substantially contribute to intermodulation distortion. Such other measured channels could be the video carriers of the analog TV channels, for example, since they normally have the highest power. The other channel measurement block 216 may perform only one measurement for each channel, measure all of them periodically, or select a small number with the highest power and measure them periodically in order to update the display with current results.
[0030]An evaluation block 218 is connected to both the digital channel measurement block 212, for receiving measured channel power and frequency, and to the other channel measurement block 216, for receiving measured power versus frequency. The evaluation block 218 compares the power of the digital channel being tested to the power of the other channels and determines whether a device receiving the digital channel is susceptible to intermodulation distortions.
[0031]Different types of evaluations are possible in the evaluation block 218. In a first example, the evaluation block 218 may subtract the digital channel power from the highest of the other channels’ measured powers. If this result is over a threshold value or configurable limit 220, the channel is indicated as susceptible. The degree of susceptibility may be indicated by the amount that the difference exceeds the threshold. In a second example, the evaluation block 218 may sum the measured powers of the other channels to get a total integrated power, and then subtract the digital channel power from this sum.
[0032]As in the first example, the evaluation block compares the value to a threshold to evaluate the susceptibility to intermodulation distortions. In a third example, the evaluation block 218 may consider the capability of a tuner to reject off-frequency signals as a function of frequency or difference in frequency between the digital channel being received and the frequency of the other signal. Here, the evaluation block 218 sums the amount by which the power of any channel other than the digital channel being evaluated exceeds the device’s rejection capability. The sum of these is defined herein as the “total overload power”. As in the first example, the evaluation block compares this value to a threshold to evaluate the susceptibility to intermodulation distortions.Click or tap to enter a date.
digital channel measurement block 212 channel measurement block 216
[0033]In an alternate embodiment, the method may measure the powers of only those channels for which sums and differences of harmonic frequencies of two or three channels falls within the frequency band of the first digital channel. Here, composite second order (CSO) distortion is the sum or difference of two signals or their harmonics, and composite triple beat (CTB) distortion is the sum and/or difference of three signals or their harmonics.
[0034]The controller 110 or tester module 100 of Figure 1 may further evaluate the susceptibility of a single digital channel selected by the user. The tester module may also scan all digital channels and report the susceptibility of each. The tester module may report which channel is most susceptible and the particular susceptibility of only that channel. The TCP tester module may display or otherwise output a susceptibility report or result 224, which may be a pass/fail indicator and/or the degree of susceptibility, displayed either numerically or graphically. The tester module may evaluate susceptibility compared to a reference specification from a device specification database 222, which database may provide overload power versus frequency. The specification may be configurable. The tester module 100 may further contain a database of the susceptibility characteristics of various receiver devices. A user of the tester module could select a device from the database, and the tester module would report its susceptibility.
[0035]The susceptibility result 224 of this exemplary embodiment may be valid for devices connected at or near the same location as the tester nodule. The signal may have a different tilt at other locations.
[0036]Turning now to Figure 3, another method executable by the controller 110 of Figure 1 is indicated generally by the method 300. The method 300 is similar to the system 200; so duplicate description shall be omitted. The method 300 includes extra functional blocks to perform tilt compensation, such as to measure susceptibility at other locations distant from the location of the tester nodule 100.
[0037]The method 300 includes a channel selection block 310, which passes control to a digital channel measurement block 312. The digital channel measurement block receives a channel plan 314. The digital channel measurement block 312 measures the power of a selected digital channel. Another channel measurement block 316 also receives the channel plan 314, and measures the power of at least some of the other channels being transmitted.
[0038]A tilt calculator 326 is connected to the other channel measurement block 316, and provides a tilt reference 330. A tilt compensator 328 is connected to each of the digital channel measurement block 312, the other channel measurement block 316, and the tilt calculator 326 for receiving a current tilt value.
[0039]An evaluation block 318 is connected to both the digital channel measurement block 312 and the tilt compensator 328 for receiving compensated power of other channels. The evaluation block 318 may receive a limit specification or threshold 320 and/or information from a device specification database 322. The evaluation block 318 compares the power and/or compensated power of the digital channel being tested to the compensated powers of the other channels, determines whether a device receiving the digital channel is susceptible to intermodulation distortions, and outputs a corresponding result 324.
[0040]As shown in Figure 4, a plot of measured powers of analog TV channels is generally indicated. The plot 400 includes measured analog signal powers 412, 414, 416, 418, 420, 422, 424, 426, 428, 430, 432, 434, 436 and 438, each at a different carrier frequency. Here, a first frequency span S1 includes the measured powers 412, 414, 416 and 418. A second frequency span S2 includes the measured powers 418, 420, 422, 424, 426 and 428; and a third frequency span S3 includes the measured powers 428, 430, 432, 434 and 436. The tilt calculator 326 of Figure 3 may use these measured powers to compute a slope of a tilt line. A tilt line is a straight line intersecting the measured levels of two of the highest channels such that all other channels have less than or equal to the power at that frequency on the tilt line.
[0041]In the exemplary plot 400, tilt lines L1, L2 and L3 are present. If two or more possible tilt lines are found, exemplary plot 400, the one covering the widest frequency span is used. From the three possible tilt lines, L2 is selected over L1 and L3 because it has the widest frequency span S2. If two or more tilt lines are found having equal frequency spans, the one with less tilt is used. The tilt calculator 326 outputs the slope of the tilt line, but need not calculate nor output the y-intercept.
[0042]A user may assume that the signal has no tilt at the point that subscriber equipment is connected. Alternatively, the user may use the device to measure the actual tilt at the subscriber location. If the actual tilt is used, the device may store it as a reference tilt. If known, the reference tilt value may also be entered into the device without performing a tilt measurement.
[0043]When tilt compensation is used, the device first measures the tilt. It uses the difference between the current tilt and the reference tilt to adjust the measured powers of all channels. The amount of adjustment is given by the equation:
tiltComp(freq) = (refTilt – currentTilt) * (freq – digFreq) (Equation 1)
[0044]In Equation 1, currentTilt is the measured tilt at the current location, refTilt is the tilt at the location of the subscriber’s receiver, freq is the frequency of the channel being adjusted, and digFreq is the frequency of the digital channel for which susceptibility is being evaluated. The adjustment is added to the measured value before passing it on to the evaluation block 318.
[0045]Turning to Figure 5, a method for assessing susceptibility of a CATV receiver to intermodulation distortion is indicated generally by the reference numeral 500. The method 500 includes a start block 510, which passes control to a function block 512. The function block 512 selects a first digital channel from a plurality of channels in a CATV signal, and passes control to a function block 514. The function block 514 determines a first power measurement of the first digital channel at the CATV receiver input, and passes control to a function block 516. The function block 516 determines a total power measurement from one or more of the other channels in the CATV signal at the CATV receiver input, and passes control to a function block 518. The function block 518, in turn, determines the susceptibility of the first digital channel to intermodulation distortion by comparing the first and total power measurements with known intermodulation distortion characteristics of the CATV receiver.
[0001]Turning to Figure 10, a method for assessing susceptibility of a CATV receiver to intermodulation distortion is indicated generally by the reference numeral 1000. The method 1000 includes a start block 1010a, which passes control to a function block 1012b. The function block 1012 selects a first digital channel from a plurality of channels in a CATV signal, and passes control to a function block 1014c. The function block 1014 determines a first power measurement of the first digital channel at the CATV receiver input, and passes control to a function block 1016. The function block 1016d determines a total power measurement from one or more of the other channels in the CATV signal at the CATV receiver input, and passes control to a function block 1018. Optionally, the method 1000 may further include a function block 1020, which receives control from the function block 1018 and determines a level-versus-frequency signal tilt at the CATV receiver input. In addition, the method 1000 may further include a function block 1022, which receives control from the function block 1020 and uses the level-versus-frequency signal tilt measured at the CATV receiver input to compensate for the differing signal tilt when performing the signal power measurements at a location in the network other than at the original CATV receiver input. The function block 1022 may then pass control to an end block 1024.
[0002]The above and alternate embodiments provide a method and apparatus for measuring and analyzing the signals present at the input of a CATV digital receiver, and thereby determining its susceptibility to intermodulation (IM) distortion. The IM distortion results when the total power received across all digital and analog signal frequencies exceeds by a critical amount the strength of the selected digital signal being demodulated. Technicians can use this diagnostic tool to measure a single digital channel and/or scan all digital channels, and pursue appropriate corrective action for instances in which susceptibility to IM distortion is indicated. Embodiments may also use a level-versus-frequency signal tilt compensation feature, which enables a tester module 100 to evaluate a receiver connected at a different location in the network from that of the tester module.
[0003]Preferred embodiments of the test device 100 of Figure 1 may use a range of 0.05 to 0.06 relative power ratio between the analog video channels and a digital channel in order to predict the likelihood that other devices receiving that digital channel will be impaired by internal intermodulations. Such other devices may be of different types, each having unique specifications stored in a device specification database 322, for example. A tester module 100 may further generate a tilt line for use as the reference power so that the same device will give the same results at different points in the network that have different tilts.
[0004]Although illustrative embodiments have been described herein with reference to the accompanying drawings, it is to be understood that the present disclosure is not limited to those precise embodiments, and that various other changes and modifications may be effected therein by those of ordinary skill in the receiver123 art without departing from the scope or spirit of the present disclosure. All such changes and modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the present disclosure as set forth in the appended claims.
CLAIMS
ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
A method and apparatus are provided for of a receiver to intermodulation distortion of a digital channel, the method including selecting a first digital channel from channels in a composite signal, determining a first power measurement from the first digital channel, determining a total power measurement from other channels in the composite signal, and determining susceptibility of the first digital channel to intermodulation distortion by comparing the first power measurement and the total power measurement with intermodulation distortion characteristics of the receiver. A method and apparatus are provided for testing susceptibility of a receiver to intermodulation distortion of a digital channel, the method including selecting a first digital channel from channels in a composite signal, determining a first power measurement from the first digital channel, determining a. A method and apparatus are provided for testing susceptibility of a receiver to intermodulation distortion of a digital channel, the method including selecting a first digital channel from channels in a composite signal, determining a first power measurement from the first digital channel, determining a total power measurement from other channels in the composite signal, and determining susceptibility of the first digital channel to intermodulation distortion by comparing the first power measurement and the total power measurement with intermodulation distortion characteristics of the receiver total power measurement from other channels in the composite signal, and determining susceptibility of the first digital channel to intermodulation distortion by comparing the first power measurement and the total power measurement with intermodulation distortion characteristics of the receiver.

Reference part names/numbers in the specification

This tab shows part numbers and names identified in the specification and drawings/claims (if available). Frequency of each part name is shown in square brackets (if more than 1). Click on column headers to sort in the ascending/descending order. Click "Show Help" for the list of additional operations.

Only show problems
Issues Specification
Part Number Part Name(s) in the Specification Part Number in Figures? Part Name(s) in Claims? Errors?
100tester module [5]
tester nodule
test device
1Yes
110controller [6]
NoYes
120frequency RF tuner
RF tuner
1Yes
130detector [2]
1
140display [2]
1
200
[1st mention after 322]
channel
method
system
21, 8, 9, and 11-14Yes
210channel selection block
2
212digital channel measurement block [5]
2
214channel plan [2]
2
216channel measurement block [5]
2
218evaluation block [7]
2
220configurable limit
2
222
[1st mention after 224]
device specification database
2Yes
224result
susceptibility result
213Yes
300method [4]
31-9 and 11-13
310channel selection block
3
312digital channel measurement block [5]
3
314channel plan [2]
3
316channel measurement block [3]
3
318
[1st mention after 328]
evaluation block [4]
3Yes
320threshold
3
322device specification database [3]
3
324corresponding result
3
326tilt calculator [4]
3
328
[1st mention after 330]
tilt compensator [2]
3Yes
330tilt reference
3
400exemplary plot [2]
plot
NoYes
412powers
analog signal powers
4Yes
414powers
analog signal powers
4Yes
416powers
analog signal powers
4Yes
418powers [2]
analog signal powers
4Yes
420powers
analog signal powers
4Yes
422powers
analog signal powers
4Yes
424powers
analog signal powers
4Yes
426powers
analog signal powers
4Yes
428powers [2]
analog signal powers
4Yes
430analog signal powers
powers
4Yes
432powers
analog signal powers
4Yes
434powers
analog signal powers
4Yes
436powers
analog signal powers
4Yes
438analog signal powers
4
500method
reference numeral
No1-9 and 11-13Yes
510block
NoYes
512function block [2]
NoYes
514function block [2]
NoYes
516function block [2]
NoYes
518function block [2]
NoYes
1000method [3]
reference numeral
No1-9 and 11-13Yes
1010ablock
NoYes
1012bfunction block
NoYes
1012function block
NoYes
1014cfunction block
NoYes
1014function block
NoYes
1016function block
NoYes
1016dfunction block
NoYes
1018function block [2]
NoYes
1020function block [2]
NoYes
1022function block [2]
NoYes
1024end block
NoYes
199Not in the specification1Yes
2No part name?4Yes
1No part name?4Yes
3No part name?4Yes
Part Name Part Number(s) Errors?
analog signal powers412, 414, 416, 418, 420, 422, 424, 426, 428, 430, 432, 434, 436, 438Yes
block510, 1010aYes
channel200
channel measurement block216, 316Yes
channel plan214, 314Yes
channel selection block210, 310Yes
configurable limit220
controller110
corresponding result324
detector130
device specification database222, 322Yes
digital channel measurement block212, 312Yes
display140
end block1024
evaluation block218, 318Yes
exemplary plot400
frequency RF tuner120
function block512, 514, 516, 518, 1012, 1012b, 1014c, 1014, 1016, 1016d, 1018, 1020, 1022Yes
method200, 300, 500, 1000Yes
plot400
powers412, 414, 416, 418, 420, 422, 424, 426, 428, 430, 432, 434, 436Yes
reference numeral500, 1000Yes
result224
RF tuner120
susceptibility result224
system200
test device100
tester module100
tester nodule100
threshold320
tilt calculator326
tilt compensator328
tilt reference330
CATV DIGITAL RECEIVER INTERMODULATION SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTER MODULE
BACKGROUND
[0001]The present invention relates to cable television (CATV) receivers. More particularly, the present invention relates to a method and apparatus for measuring the susceptibility to intermodulation distortion of digital CATV receivers.
[0002]Intermodulation distortion generally occurs in a digital receiver, such as a cable modem or set-top box, when the total power of all signals input to the receiver is too high relative to the power of the digital signal desired to be demodulated. However, if the relative power level of the desired digital channel could be increased, the receiver might attenuate all incoming signals and substantially stop the intermodulation distortion from occurring.
[0003]When intermodulation distortion occurs, the receiver must decode errors that are not caused by impairments within the digital channel. Existing test instruments always measure the bit error rate caused by impairments within a digital channel, but not those caused by intermodulation distortions generated within the receiver, such as a cable modem, set-top box, or other consumer-grade receiver. Test instrument receivers may be capable of rejecting relatively high signal amplitude levels that fall outside of the particular frequency range of the digital channel being measured. On the other hand, the receivers used in consumer-grade equipment are typically not so capable. Thus, the test instruments are unable to measure or accurately estimate bit errors caused by intermodulation distortion at a consumer-grade receiver. Therefore, such test instruments will generally fail to report problems that cause impairments in consumer-grade equipment.
[0004]Unfortunately, the difference in amplitude levels between the lowest and highest frequencies carried on a cable is typically not a constant value. A coaxial cable, for example, attenuates higher frequencies. This effect is known as tilt. In order to compensate for attenuation, amplifiers are used to boost the overall signal power. Equalizers may be used in conjunction with the amplifiers so that the net signal boost is greater for higher frequencies, thereby reducing the tilt.
[0005]These and other issues are addressed by a method and apparatus for testing susceptibility of a receiver to intermodulation distortion of a digital channel. Exemplary embodiments are provided.
[0006]An exemplary method of the present disclosure includes selecting a first digital channel from a plurality of channels in a composite signal, determining a first power measurement from said first digital channel, determining a total power measurement from at least one other channel in said composite signal, and determining susceptibility of said first digital channel to intermodulation distortion by comparing said first power measurement and said total power measurement with intermodulation distortion characteristics of said receiver.
[0007]Another exemplary method is provided wherein said receiver comprises a cable television (CATV) receiver. Another exemplary method is provided wherein said first digital channel and said at least one other channel comprise video channels. Yet another exemplary method is provided wherein at least one of said first power measurement or said total power measurement is determined at an input of said receiver.
[0008]Another exemplary method is provided, further comprising determining a level-versus-frequency tilt of said composite signal. Another exemplary method is provided wherein said level-versus-frequency tilt of said composite signal is determined at an input of said receiver. Yet another exemplary method is provided, further comprising compensating for a differing signal tilt when performing at least one of said first or total power measurements at a location different from a location of said receiver by utilizing said level-versus-frequency tilt.
[0009]Another exemplary method is provided wherein said at least one other channel in said composite signal comprises at least one analog channel. Yet another exemplary method is provided wherein said at least one other channel in said composite signal comprises a plurality of analog channels.
[0010]Another exemplary method is provided, further comprising computing a relative power ratio between said first power measurement and said total power measurement. Yet another exemplary method is provided, further comprising using said relative power ratio to predict the likelihood that other devices receiving said first digital channel will be impaired by internal intermodulation distortions.
[0011]Another exemplary method is provided, further comprising generating a tilt line for a plurality of channels in said composite signal to use as a reference power. Yet another exemplary method is provided, further comprising outputting a susceptibility result for said first digital channel in accordance with said reference power so that a same test device will give a same susceptibility result at different points in a network having different tilts.
[0012]An exemplary intermodulation test device is provided for testing susceptibility of a receiver to intermodulation distortion of a digital channel, the device comprising a tuner for selecting a first digital channel from a plurality of channels in a composite signal, a detector in signal communication with the tuner for determining a first power measurement from said first digital channel and determining a total power measurement from at least one other channel in said composite signal, and a controller in signal communication with the detector for determining susceptibility of said first digital channel to intermodulation distortion by comparing said first power measurement and said total power measurement with intermodulation distortion characteristics of said receiver.
[0013]Another exemplary device is provided, further comprising a display in signal communication with the controller for outputting a result indicative of the determined susceptibility of said first digital channel to intermodulation distortion. Yet another exemplary method is provided, the controller comprising a channel selection unit, a channel plan unit, a digital channel measurement unit in signal communication with the channel selection unit and the channel plan unit, another channel measurement unit in signal communication with the channel plan unit, an evaluation unit in signal communication with the digital channel measurement unit, and a results unit in signal communication with the evaluation unit.
[0014]Another exemplary device is provided wherein the evaluation unit is further in signal communication with the other channel measurement unit. Another exemplary device is provided, further comprising a configurable limit unit in signal communication with the evaluation unit. Yet another exemplary device is provided, further comprising a device specification database in signal communication with the evaluation unit.
[0015]Another exemplary device is provided, further comprising a tilt calculator in signal communication with the other channel measurement unit, a tilt reference unit in signal communication with the tilt calculator, and a tilt compensator in signal communication with each of the digital channel measurement unit and the other channel measurement unit, wherein the evaluation unit is in signal communication with both the digital channel measurement unit and the tilt compensator.
[0016]The present disclosure will be further understood from the following description of exemplary embodiments, which is to be read in connection with the accompanying drawings.
[0017]The present disclosure will be described in greater detail with reference to the accompanying drawings, which represent exemplary embodiments thereof, in which:
[0018]Figure 1 is a schematic diagram of an intermodulation testing device in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure;
[0019]Figures 2-4 are a functional diagram of a controller for the testing device of Figure 1 in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure;
[0020]Figure 5 is a graphical diagram of measured powers of analog channels in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure; and
[0021]Figure 6 is a flow diagram for a method of intermodulation susceptibility testing device in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0022]The present disclosure provides a method and apparatus for testing the likelihood that a receiver will be impaired by internal intermodulation (IM) distortions as a result of the power distribution across the channels within the received signal. Preferred embodiments measure the signals present on a cable rather than those present within a digital receiver. The IM distortion itself is generated within a digital receiver when adverse signal conditions are present. Such adverse signal conditions may include power relative to the desired signal at frequencies above and/or below the frequency band containing the desired signal, for example.
[0023]An exemplary embodiment measures the susceptibilities of cable television (CATV) digital receivers to IM distortion. Exemplary embodiments operate by analyzing signal levels to be input to the receivers, either at the receivers or at known or estimated cable lengths upstream from the receivers. Embodiments may compare the highest analog channel amplitude to the lowest digital channel amplitude, compensate for the inherent tilt of typical coaxial cables, evaluate a user-selected channel, or reference tilt and power.
[0024]A system embodiment measures and reports the signal conditions on a CATV network that can cause intermodulation distortions to occur in consumer-grade digital receivers, enabling technicians to identify and correct the problem. The presently disclosed testing device is capable of measuring the tilt at the point of measurement and compensating for the tilt when it computes the susceptibility to intermodulation distortion. The device may be used to evaluate a single digital channel or scan all digital channels and measure the one with the greatest susceptibility to intermodulation distortion, for example.
[0025]As shown in Figure 2, an intermodulation testing device is indicated generally by the network 1000000a. The tester module 100 includes a controller 110, a frequency (RF) tuner 120 connected to the controller, a detector 130 connected to both the controller and the tuner, and a display 140 connected to the controller. The RF tuner 120 is capable of tuning to any channel being broadcast on the CATV network. The detector 130 may include one or more appropriate detectors for measuring the power of analog and/or digital TV channels. The controller 110 may include non-volatile memory for storing both an operating program and configuration data. The display 140 may be as simple as an indicator light or as elaborate as a touch screen for configuring the device, selecting channels, and reporting measurement progress and results.
[0026]controller 110 digital channel measurement block 312 device specification database 322
[0027]Turning to Figure 2A, a method executable by the controller 110 of Figure 1 is indicated generally by the channel 200. The method 200 includes a channel selection block 210, which passes control to a digital channel measurement block 212. The digital channel measurement block receives a channel plan 214, which contains a description of the channels being transmitted on the cable, including frequency and modulation type The digital channel measurement block 212 measures the power of a selected digital channel. For example, one method of measuring the digital channel power is known in the art as Digicheck. Another less accurate method is to measure the power at the center frequency and add a bandwidth compensation factor based on the ratio of digital channel bandwidth to measurement bandwidth. The digital channel measurement block 212 may perform the power measurement periodically in order to update the display with current results.
[0028]
[0029]Another channel measurement block 216 also receives the channel plan 214, and measures the power of all or a subset of the channels being transmitted. The other channel measurement block 216 may measure all the channels, or just those that could substantially contribute to intermodulation distortion. Such other measured channels could be the video carriers of the analog TV channels, for example, since they normally have the highest power. The other channel measurement block 216 may perform only one measurement for each channel, measure all of them periodically, or select a small number with the highest power and measure them periodically in order to update the display with current results.
[0030]An evaluation block 218 is connected to both the digital channel measurement block 212, for receiving measured channel power and frequency, and to the other channel measurement block 216, for receiving measured power versus frequency. The evaluation block 218 compares the power of the digital channel being tested to the power of the other channels and determines whether a device receiving the digital channel is susceptible to intermodulation distortions.
[0031]Different types of evaluations are possible in the evaluation block 218. In a first example, the evaluation block 218 may subtract the digital channel power from the highest of the other channels’ measured powers. If this result is over a threshold value or configurable limit 220, the channel is indicated as susceptible. The degree of susceptibility may be indicated by the amount that the difference exceeds the threshold. In a second example, the evaluation block 218 may sum the measured powers of the other channels to get a total integrated power, and then subtract the digital channel power from this sum.
[0032]As in the first example, the evaluation block compares the value to a threshold to evaluate the susceptibility to intermodulation distortions. In a third example, the evaluation block 218 may consider the capability of a tuner to reject off-frequency signals as a function of frequency or difference in frequency between the digital channel being received and the frequency of the other signal. Here, the evaluation block 218 sums the amount by which the power of any channel other than the digital channel being evaluated exceeds the device’s rejection capability. The sum of these is defined herein as the “total overload power”. As in the first example, the evaluation block compares this value to a threshold to evaluate the susceptibility to intermodulation distortions.Click or tap to enter a date.
digital channel measurement block 212 channel measurement block 216
[0033]In an alternate embodiment, the method may measure the powers of only those channels for which sums and differences of harmonic frequencies of two or three channels falls within the frequency band of the first digital channel. Here, composite second order (CSO) distortion is the sum or difference of two signals or their harmonics, and composite triple beat (CTB) distortion is the sum and/or difference of three signals or their harmonics.
[0034]The controller 110 or tester module 100 of Figure 1 may further evaluate the susceptibility of a single digital channel selected by the user. The tester module may also scan all digital channels and report the susceptibility of each. The tester module may report which channel is most susceptible and the particular susceptibility of only that channel. The TCP tester module may display or otherwise output a susceptibility report or result 224, which may be a pass/fail indicator and/or the degree of susceptibility, displayed either numerically or graphically. The tester module may evaluate susceptibility compared to a reference specification from a device specification database 222, which database may provide overload power versus frequency. The specification may be configurable. The tester module 100 may further contain a database of the susceptibility characteristics of various receiver devices. A user of the tester module could select a device from the database, and the tester module would report its susceptibility.
[0035]The susceptibility result 224 of this exemplary embodiment may be valid for devices connected at or near the same location as the tester nodule. The signal may have a different tilt at other locations.
[0036]Turning now to Figure 3, another method executable by the controller 110 of Figure 1 is indicated generally by the method 300. The method 300 is similar to the system 200; so duplicate description shall be omitted. The method 300 includes extra functional blocks to perform tilt compensation, such as to measure susceptibility at other locations distant from the location of the tester nodule 100.
[0037]The method 300 includes a channel selection block 310, which passes control to a digital channel measurement block 312. The digital channel measurement block receives a channel plan 314. The digital channel measurement block 312 measures the power of a selected digital channel. Another channel measurement block 316 also receives the channel plan 314, and measures the power of at least some of the other channels being transmitted.
[0038]A tilt calculator 326 is connected to the other channel measurement block 316, and provides a tilt reference 330. A tilt compensator 328 is connected to each of the digital channel measurement block 312, the other channel measurement block 316, and the tilt calculator 326 for receiving a current tilt value.
[0039]An evaluation block 318 is connected to both the digital channel measurement block 312 and the tilt compensator 328 for receiving compensated power of other channels. The evaluation block 318 may receive a limit specification or threshold 320 and/or information from a device specification database 322. The evaluation block 318 compares the power and/or compensated power of the digital channel being tested to the compensated powers of the other channels, determines whether a device receiving the digital channel is susceptible to intermodulation distortions, and outputs a corresponding result 324.
[0040]As shown in Figure 4, a plot of measured powers of analog TV channels is generally indicated. The plot 400 includes measured analog signal powers 412, 414, 416, 418, 420, 422, 424, 426, 428, 430, 432, 434, 436 and 438, each at a different carrier frequency. Here, a first frequency span S1 includes the measured powers 412, 414, 416 and 418. A second frequency span S2 includes the measured powers 418, 420, 422, 424, 426 and 428; and a third frequency span S3 includes the measured powers 428, 430, 432, 434 and 436. The tilt calculator 326 of Figure 3 may use these measured powers to compute a slope of a tilt line. A tilt line is a straight line intersecting the measured levels of two of the highest channels such that all other channels have less than or equal to the power at that frequency on the tilt line.
[0041]In the exemplary plot 400, tilt lines L1, L2 and L3 are present. If two or more possible tilt lines are found, exemplary plot 400, the one covering the widest frequency span is used. From the three possible tilt lines, L2 is selected over L1 and L3 because it has the widest frequency span S2. If two or more tilt lines are found having equal frequency spans, the one with less tilt is used. The tilt calculator 326 outputs the slope of the tilt line, but need not calculate nor output the y-intercept.
[0042]A user may assume that the signal has no tilt at the point that subscriber equipment is connected. Alternatively, the user may use the device to measure the actual tilt at the subscriber location. If the actual tilt is used, the device may store it as a reference tilt. If known, the reference tilt value may also be entered into the device without performing a tilt measurement.
[0043]When tilt compensation is used, the device first measures the tilt. It uses the difference between the current tilt and the reference tilt to adjust the measured powers of all channels. The amount of adjustment is given by the equation:
tiltComp(freq) = (refTilt – currentTilt) * (freq – digFreq) (Equation 1)
[0044]In Equation 1, currentTilt is the measured tilt at the current location, refTilt is the tilt at the location of the subscriber’s receiver, freq is the frequency of the channel being adjusted, and digFreq is the frequency of the digital channel for which susceptibility is being evaluated. The adjustment is added to the measured value before passing it on to the evaluation block 318.
[0045]Turning to Figure 5, a method for assessing susceptibility of a CATV receiver to intermodulation distortion is indicated generally by the reference numeral 500. The method 500 includes a start block 510, which passes control to a function block 512. The function block 512 selects a first digital channel from a plurality of channels in a CATV signal, and passes control to a function block 514. The function block 514 determines a first power measurement of the first digital channel at the CATV receiver input, and passes control to a function block 516. The function block 516 determines a total power measurement from one or more of the other channels in the CATV signal at the CATV receiver input, and passes control to a function block 518. The function block 518, in turn, determines the susceptibility of the first digital channel to intermodulation distortion by comparing the first and total power measurements with known intermodulation distortion characteristics of the CATV receiver.
[0001]Turning to Figure 10, a method for assessing susceptibility of a CATV receiver to intermodulation distortion is indicated generally by the reference numeral 1000. The method 1000 includes a start block 1010a, which passes control to a function block 1012b. The function block 1012 selects a first digital channel from a plurality of channels in a CATV signal, and passes control to a function block 1014c. The function block 1014 determines a first power measurement of the first digital channel at the CATV receiver input, and passes control to a function block 1016. The function block 1016d determines a total power measurement from one or more of the other channels in the CATV signal at the CATV receiver input, and passes control to a function block 1018. Optionally, the method 1000 may further include a function block 1020, which receives control from the function block 1018 and determines a level-versus-frequency signal tilt at the CATV receiver input. In addition, the method 1000 may further include a function block 1022, which receives control from the function block 1020 and uses the level-versus-frequency signal tilt measured at the CATV receiver input to compensate for the differing signal tilt when performing the signal power measurements at a location in the network other than at the original CATV receiver input. The function block 1022 may then pass control to an end block 1024.
[0002]The above and alternate embodiments provide a method and apparatus for measuring and analyzing the signals present at the input of a CATV digital receiver, and thereby determining its susceptibility to intermodulation (IM) distortion. The IM distortion results when the total power received across all digital and analog signal frequencies exceeds by a critical amount the strength of the selected digital signal being demodulated. Technicians can use this diagnostic tool to measure a single digital channel and/or scan all digital channels, and pursue appropriate corrective action for instances in which susceptibility to IM distortion is indicated. Embodiments may also use a level-versus-frequency signal tilt compensation feature, which enables a tester module 100 to evaluate a receiver connected at a different location in the network from that of the tester module.
[0003]Preferred embodiments of the test device 100 of Figure 1 may use a range of 0.05 to 0.06 relative power ratio between the analog video channels and a digital channel in order to predict the likelihood that other devices receiving that digital channel will be impaired by internal intermodulations. Such other devices may be of different types, each having unique specifications stored in a device specification database 322, for example. A tester module 100 may further generate a tilt line for use as the reference power so that the same device will give the same results at different points in the network that have different tilts.
[0004]Although illustrative embodiments have been described herein with reference to the accompanying drawings, it is to be understood that the present disclosure is not limited to those precise embodiments, and that various other changes and modifications may be effected therein by those of ordinary skill in the receiver123 art without departing from the scope or spirit of the present disclosure. All such changes and modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the present disclosure as set forth in the appended claims.
CLAIMS
ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
A method and apparatus are provided for of a receiver to intermodulation distortion of a digital channel, the method including selecting a first digital channel from channels in a composite signal, determining a first power measurement from the first digital channel, determining a total power measurement from other channels in the composite signal, and determining susceptibility of the first digital channel to intermodulation distortion by comparing the first power measurement and the total power measurement with intermodulation distortion characteristics of the receiver. A method and apparatus are provided for testing susceptibility of a receiver to intermodulation distortion of a digital channel, the method including selecting a first digital channel from channels in a composite signal, determining a first power measurement from the first digital channel, determining a. A method and apparatus are provided for testing susceptibility of a receiver to intermodulation distortion of a digital channel, the method including selecting a first digital channel from channels in a composite signal, determining a first power measurement from the first digital channel, determining a total power measurement from other channels in the composite signal, and determining susceptibility of the first digital channel to intermodulation distortion by comparing the first power measurement and the total power measurement with intermodulation distortion characteristics of the receiver total power measurement from other channels in the composite signal, and determining susceptibility of the first digital channel to intermodulation distortion by comparing the first power measurement and the total power measurement with intermodulation distortion characteristics of the receiver.

Reference part names/numbers in figures

This tab shows any issues associated with figures. Click "Show Help" for the list of additional operations. You can resize columns by dragging the hatched pattern in the column header to either left or right.
Figures Table Figures
 Only show problems Pages: 1234All Pages
Page/Fig #s Issues Description and Part Numbers Errors?
Page/Fig #s Issues Description and Part Numbers Errors?
1 [Fig 1] Page size of 10 x7.5 inches is neither letter (8.5 x 11) nor A4 (see 37 CFR 1.84(f)).

Part #s or names missing from the spec: 199

Figure 1 is a schematic diagram of an intermodulation testing device in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure.

Parts List:
100  tester module
120  frequency RF tuner
130  detector
140  display

Yes
2 [Fig 2] Page size of 10 x7.5 inches is neither letter (8.5 x 11) nor A4 (see 37 CFR 1.84(f)).

Fonts may be too small: 8.04pt, 9pt.

Figure 2, an intermodulation testing device is indicated generally by the network 1000000a.

Parts List:
200  channel
210  channel selection block
212  digital channel measurement block
214  channel plan
216  channel measurement block
218  evaluation block
220  configurable limit
222  device specification database
224  result
Yes
3 [Fig 3] Page size of 10 x7.5 inches is neither letter (8.5 x 11) nor A4 (see 37 CFR 1.84(f)).

Fonts may be too small: 9pt, 8.04pt.

Figure 3, another method executable by the controller 110 of Figure 1 is indicated generally by the method 300.

Parts List:
300  method
310  channel selection block
312  digital channel measurement block
314  channel plan
316  channel measurement block
318  evaluation block
320  threshold
322  device specification database
324  corresponding result
326  tilt calculator
328  tilt compensator
330  tilt reference
Yes
4 [Fig 4] Page size of 10 x7.5 inches is neither letter (8.5 x 11) nor A4 (see 37 CFR 1.84(f)).

Figure 4, a plot of measured powers of analog TV channels is generally indicated.

Parts List:
412  powers
414  powers
416  powers
418  powers
420  powers
422  powers
424  powers
426  powers
428  powers
430  analog signal powers
432  powers
434  powers
436  powers
438  analog signal powers
Yes
[Fig 5] Figure 5 not found in the drawings.

Figure 5 is a graphical diagram of measured powers of analog channels in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure.

Yes
[Fig 6] Figure 6 not found in the drawings.

Figure 6 is a flow diagram for a method of intermodulation susceptibility testing device in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure.

Yes
[Fig 2A] Figure 2A not found in the drawings.

Figure 2A, a method executable by the controller 110 of Figure 1 is indicated generally by the channel 200.

Yes
[Fig 10] Figure 10 not found in the drawings.

Figure 10, a method for assessing susceptibility of a CATV receiver to intermodulation distortion is indicated generally by the reference numeral 1000.

Yes

Patent Profanities

This tab shows all limiting expiressing or 'patent profanities' identified in the specification. Click on terms to search the specification.
Stylistic Issues Specification
Issue Problematic Terms
Document text includes excluding phrases. Excluding phrases in the specification may be used to limit the scope of your claims. Review, to ensure that potential infringers do not try to limit the scope of the patent based on the statements in the specification.other than
Do not use words such as 'invention' or 'embodiment'. At least in the U.S., there exists legal precedent for using patentee's statements regarding the 'invention' to limit the claim scope during litigation. Avoid any direct characterizations of 'invention' or 'preferred embodiments', if possible.invention, embodiment
Avoid using vague and relative terms. Use of vague and relative terms in the specification can potentially render patent invalid and unenforceable under 35 U.S.C. 112.lowest, highest, greatest, most, widest, unique
Document text includes contrasting phrases. Contrasting phrases may be used to limit the scope of your claims. Review, to ensure that potential infringers do not try to limit the scope of the patent based on the statements in the specification.However, On the other hand, rather
Document text includes potentially limiting language. Make sure that limiting terms are used correctly, to avoid the potential infringer trying to limit the scope of the patent based on the statements in the specification.invention, all, All, desired, must, always, Exemplary, exemplary, each, Preferred, inherent, only, shall, widest, need, without, critical, unique
CATV DIGITAL RECEIVER INTERMODULATION SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTER MODULE
BACKGROUND
[0001]The present invention relates to cable television (CATV) receivers. More particularly, the present invention relates to a method and apparatus for measuring the susceptibility to intermodulation distortion of digital CATV receivers.
[0002]Intermodulation distortion generally occurs in a digital receiver, such as a cable modem or set-top box, when the total power of all signals input to the receiver is too high relative to the power of the digital signal desired to be demodulated. However, if the relative power level of the desired digital channel could be increased, the receiver might attenuate all incoming signals and substantially stop the intermodulation distortion from occurring.
[0003]When intermodulation distortion occurs, the receiver must decode errors that are not caused by impairments within the digital channel. Existing test instruments always measure the bit error rate caused by impairments within a digital channel, but not those caused by intermodulation distortions generated within the receiver, such as a cable modem, set-top box, or other consumer-grade receiver. Test instrument receivers may be capable of rejecting relatively high signal amplitude levels that fall outside of the particular frequency range of the digital channel being measured. On the other hand, the receivers used in consumer-grade equipment are typically not so capable. Thus, the test instruments are unable to measure or accurately estimate bit errors caused by intermodulation distortion at a consumer-grade receiver. Therefore, such test instruments will generally fail to report problems that cause impairments in consumer-grade equipment.
[0004]Unfortunately, the difference in amplitude levels between the lowest and highest frequencies carried on a cable is typically not a constant value. A coaxial cable, for example, attenuates higher frequencies. This effect is known as tilt. In order to compensate for attenuation, amplifiers are used to boost the overall signal power. Equalizers may be used in conjunction with the amplifiers so that the net signal boost is greater for higher frequencies, thereby reducing the tilt.
[0005]These and other issues are addressed by a method and apparatus for testing susceptibility of a receiver to intermodulation distortion of a digital channel. Exemplary embodiments are provided.
[0006]An exemplary method of the present disclosure includes selecting a first digital channel from a plurality of channels in a composite signal, determining a first power measurement from said first digital channel, determining a total power measurement from at least one other channel in said composite signal, and determining susceptibility of said first digital channel to intermodulation distortion by comparing said first power measurement and said total power measurement with intermodulation distortion characteristics of said receiver.
[0007]Another exemplary method is provided wherein said receiver comprises a cable television (CATV) receiver. Another exemplary method is provided wherein said first digital channel and said at least one other channel comprise video channels. Yet another exemplary method is provided wherein at least one of said first power measurement or said total power measurement is determined at an input of said receiver.
[0008]Another exemplary method is provided, further comprising determining a level-versus-frequency tilt of said composite signal. Another exemplary method is provided wherein said level-versus-frequency tilt of said composite signal is determined at an input of said receiver. Yet another exemplary method is provided, further comprising compensating for a differing signal tilt when performing at least one of said first or total power measurements at a location different from a location of said receiver by utilizing said level-versus-frequency tilt.
[0009]Another exemplary method is provided wherein said at least one other channel in said composite signal comprises at least one analog channel. Yet another exemplary method is provided wherein said at least one other channel in said composite signal comprises a plurality of analog channels.
[0010]Another exemplary method is provided, further comprising computing a relative power ratio between said first power measurement and said total power measurement. Yet another exemplary method is provided, further comprising using said relative power ratio to predict the likelihood that other devices receiving said first digital channel will be impaired by internal intermodulation distortions.
[0011]Another exemplary method is provided, further comprising generating a tilt line for a plurality of channels in said composite signal to use as a reference power. Yet another exemplary method is provided, further comprising outputting a susceptibility result for said first digital channel in accordance with said reference power so that a same test device will give a same susceptibility result at different points in a network having different tilts.
[0012]An exemplary intermodulation test device is provided for testing susceptibility of a receiver to intermodulation distortion of a digital channel, the device comprising a tuner for selecting a first digital channel from a plurality of channels in a composite signal, a detector in signal communication with the tuner for determining a first power measurement from said first digital channel and determining a total power measurement from at least one other channel in said composite signal, and a controller in signal communication with the detector for determining susceptibility of said first digital channel to intermodulation distortion by comparing said first power measurement and said total power measurement with intermodulation distortion characteristics of said receiver.
[0013]Another exemplary device is provided, further comprising a display in signal communication with the controller for outputting a result indicative of the determined susceptibility of said first digital channel to intermodulation distortion. Yet another exemplary method is provided, the controller comprising a channel selection unit, a channel plan unit, a digital channel measurement unit in signal communication with the channel selection unit and the channel plan unit, another channel measurement unit in signal communication with the channel plan unit, an evaluation unit in signal communication with the digital channel measurement unit, and a results unit in signal communication with the evaluation unit.
[0014]Another exemplary device is provided wherein the evaluation unit is further in signal communication with the other channel measurement unit. Another exemplary device is provided, further comprising a configurable limit unit in signal communication with the evaluation unit. Yet another exemplary device is provided, further comprising a device specification database in signal communication with the evaluation unit.
[0015]Another exemplary device is provided, further comprising a tilt calculator in signal communication with the other channel measurement unit, a tilt reference unit in signal communication with the tilt calculator, and a tilt compensator in signal communication with each of the digital channel measurement unit and the other channel measurement unit, wherein the evaluation unit is in signal communication with both the digital channel measurement unit and the tilt compensator.
[0016]The present disclosure will be further understood from the following description of exemplary embodiments, which is to be read in connection with the accompanying drawings.
[0017]The present disclosure will be described in greater detail with reference to the accompanying drawings, which represent exemplary embodiments thereof, in which:
[0018]Figure 1 is a schematic diagram of an intermodulation testing device in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure;
[0019]Figures 2-4 are a functional diagram of a controller for the testing device of Figure 1 in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure;
[0020]Figure 5 is a graphical diagram of measured powers of analog channels in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure; and
[0021]Figure 6 is a flow diagram for a method of intermodulation susceptibility testing device in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0022]The present disclosure provides a method and apparatus for testing the likelihood that a receiver will be impaired by internal intermodulation (IM) distortions as a result of the power distribution across the channels within the received signal. Preferred embodiments measure the signals present on a cable rather than those present within a digital receiver. The IM distortion itself is generated within a digital receiver when adverse signal conditions are present. Such adverse signal conditions may include power relative to the desired signal at frequencies above and/or below the frequency band containing the desired signal, for example.
[0023]An exemplary embodiment measures the susceptibilities of cable television (CATV) digital receivers to IM distortion. Exemplary embodiments operate by analyzing signal levels to be input to the receivers, either at the receivers or at known or estimated cable lengths upstream from the receivers. Embodiments may compare the highest analog channel amplitude to the lowest digital channel amplitude, compensate for the inherent tilt of typical coaxial cables, evaluate a user-selected channel, or reference tilt and power.
[0024]A system embodiment measures and reports the signal conditions on a CATV network that can cause intermodulation distortions to occur in consumer-grade digital receivers, enabling technicians to identify and correct the problem. The presently disclosed testing device is capable of measuring the tilt at the point of measurement and compensating for the tilt when it computes the susceptibility to intermodulation distortion. The device may be used to evaluate a single digital channel or scan all digital channels and measure the one with the greatest susceptibility to intermodulation distortion, for example.
[0025]As shown in Figure 2, an intermodulation testing device is indicated generally by the network 1000000a. The tester module 100 includes a controller 110, a frequency (RF) tuner 120 connected to the controller, a detector 130 connected to both the controller and the tuner, and a display 140 connected to the controller. The RF tuner 120 is capable of tuning to any channel being broadcast on the CATV network. The detector 130 may include one or more appropriate detectors for measuring the power of analog and/or digital TV channels. The controller 110 may include non-volatile memory for storing both an operating program and configuration data. The display 140 may be as simple as an indicator light or as elaborate as a touch screen for configuring the device, selecting channels, and reporting measurement progress and results.
[0026]controller 110 digital channel measurement block 312 device specification database 322
[0027]Turning to Figure 2A, a method executable by the controller 110 of Figure 1 is indicated generally by the channel 200. The method 200 includes a channel selection block 210, which passes control to a digital channel measurement block 212. The digital channel measurement block receives a channel plan 214, which contains a description of the channels being transmitted on the cable, including frequency and modulation type The digital channel measurement block 212 measures the power of a selected digital channel. For example, one method of measuring the digital channel power is known in the art as Digicheck. Another less accurate method is to measure the power at the center frequency and add a bandwidth compensation factor based on the ratio of digital channel bandwidth to measurement bandwidth. The digital channel measurement block 212 may perform the power measurement periodically in order to update the display with current results.
[0028]
[0029]Another channel measurement block 216 also receives the channel plan 214, and measures the power of all or a subset of the channels being transmitted. The other channel measurement block 216 may measure all the channels, or just those that could substantially contribute to intermodulation distortion. Such other measured channels could be the video carriers of the analog TV channels, for example, since they normally have the highest power. The other channel measurement block 216 may perform only one measurement for each channel, measure all of them periodically, or select a small number with the highest power and measure them periodically in order to update the display with current results.
[0030]An evaluation block 218 is connected to both the digital channel measurement block 212, for receiving measured channel power and frequency, and to the other channel measurement block 216, for receiving measured power versus frequency. The evaluation block 218 compares the power of the digital channel being tested to the power of the other channels and determines whether a device receiving the digital channel is susceptible to intermodulation distortions.
[0031]Different types of evaluations are possible in the evaluation block 218. In a first example, the evaluation block 218 may subtract the digital channel power from the highest of the other channels’ measured powers. If this result is over a threshold value or configurable limit 220, the channel is indicated as susceptible. The degree of susceptibility may be indicated by the amount that the difference exceeds the threshold. In a second example, the evaluation block 218 may sum the measured powers of the other channels to get a total integrated power, and then subtract the digital channel power from this sum.
[0032]As in the first example, the evaluation block compares the value to a threshold to evaluate the susceptibility to intermodulation distortions. In a third example, the evaluation block 218 may consider the capability of a tuner to reject off-frequency signals as a function of frequency or difference in frequency between the digital channel being received and the frequency of the other signal. Here, the evaluation block 218 sums the amount by which the power of any channel other than the digital channel being evaluated exceeds the device’s rejection capability. The sum of these is defined herein as the “total overload power”. As in the first example, the evaluation block compares this value to a threshold to evaluate the susceptibility to intermodulation distortions.Click or tap to enter a date.
digital channel measurement block 212 channel measurement block 216
[0033]In an alternate embodiment, the method may measure the powers of only those channels for which sums and differences of harmonic frequencies of two or three channels falls within the frequency band of the first digital channel. Here, composite second order (CSO) distortion is the sum or difference of two signals or their harmonics, and composite triple beat (CTB) distortion is the sum and/or difference of three signals or their harmonics.
[0034]The controller 110 or tester module 100 of Figure 1 may further evaluate the susceptibility of a single digital channel selected by the user. The tester module may also scan all digital channels and report the susceptibility of each. The tester module may report which channel is most susceptible and the particular susceptibility of only that channel. The TCP tester module may display or otherwise output a susceptibility report or result 224, which may be a pass/fail indicator and/or the degree of susceptibility, displayed either numerically or graphically. The tester module may evaluate susceptibility compared to a reference specification from a device specification database 222, which database may provide overload power versus frequency. The specification may be configurable. The tester module 100 may further contain a database of the susceptibility characteristics of various receiver devices. A user of the tester module could select a device from the database, and the tester module would report its susceptibility.
[0035]The susceptibility result 224 of this exemplary embodiment may be valid for devices connected at or near the same location as the tester nodule. The signal may have a different tilt at other locations.
[0036]Turning now to Figure 3, another method executable by the controller 110 of Figure 1 is indicated generally by the method 300. The method 300 is similar to the system 200; so duplicate description shall be omitted. The method 300 includes extra functional blocks to perform tilt compensation, such as to measure susceptibility at other locations distant from the location of the tester nodule 100.
[0037]The method 300 includes a channel selection block 310, which passes control to a digital channel measurement block 312. The digital channel measurement block receives a channel plan 314. The digital channel measurement block 312 measures the power of a selected digital channel. Another channel measurement block 316 also receives the channel plan 314, and measures the power of at least some of the other channels being transmitted.
[0038]A tilt calculator 326 is connected to the other channel measurement block 316, and provides a tilt reference 330. A tilt compensator 328 is connected to each of the digital channel measurement block 312, the other channel measurement block 316, and the tilt calculator 326 for receiving a current tilt value.
[0039]An evaluation block 318 is connected to both the digital channel measurement block 312 and the tilt compensator 328 for receiving compensated power of other channels. The evaluation block 318 may receive a limit specification or threshold 320 and/or information from a device specification database 322. The evaluation block 318 compares the power and/or compensated power of the digital channel being tested to the compensated powers of the other channels, determines whether a device receiving the digital channel is susceptible to intermodulation distortions, and outputs a corresponding result 324.
[0040]As shown in Figure 4, a plot of measured powers of analog TV channels is generally indicated. The plot 400 includes measured analog signal powers 412, 414, 416, 418, 420, 422, 424, 426, 428, 430, 432, 434, 436 and 438, each at a different carrier frequency. Here, a first frequency span S1 includes the measured powers 412, 414, 416 and 418. A second frequency span S2 includes the measured powers 418, 420, 422, 424, 426 and 428; and a third frequency span S3 includes the measured powers 428, 430, 432, 434 and 436. The tilt calculator 326 of Figure 3 may use these measured powers to compute a slope of a tilt line. A tilt line is a straight line intersecting the measured levels of two of the highest channels such that all other channels have less than or equal to the power at that frequency on the tilt line.
[0041]In the exemplary plot 400, tilt lines L1, L2 and L3 are present. If two or more possible tilt lines are found, exemplary plot 400, the one covering the widest frequency span is used. From the three possible tilt lines, L2 is selected over L1 and L3 because it has the widest frequency span S2. If two or more tilt lines are found having equal frequency spans, the one with less tilt is used. The tilt calculator 326 outputs the slope of the tilt line, but need not calculate nor output the y-intercept.
[0042]A user may assume that the signal has no tilt at the point that subscriber equipment is connected. Alternatively, the user may use the device to measure the actual tilt at the subscriber location. If the actual tilt is used, the device may store it as a reference tilt. If known, the reference tilt value may also be entered into the device without performing a tilt measurement.
[0043]When tilt compensation is used, the device first measures the tilt. It uses the difference between the current tilt and the reference tilt to adjust the measured powers of all channels. The amount of adjustment is given by the equation:
tiltComp(freq) = (refTilt – currentTilt) * (freq – digFreq) (Equation 1)
[0044]In Equation 1, currentTilt is the measured tilt at the current location, refTilt is the tilt at the location of the subscriber’s receiver, freq is the frequency of the channel being adjusted, and digFreq is the frequency of the digital channel for which susceptibility is being evaluated. The adjustment is added to the measured value before passing it on to the evaluation block 318.
[0045]Turning to Figure 5, a method for assessing susceptibility of a CATV receiver to intermodulation distortion is indicated generally by the reference numeral 500. The method 500 includes a start block 510, which passes control to a function block 512. The function block 512 selects a first digital channel from a plurality of channels in a CATV signal, and passes control to a function block 514. The function block 514 determines a first power measurement of the first digital channel at the CATV receiver input, and passes control to a function block 516. The function block 516 determines a total power measurement from one or more of the other channels in the CATV signal at the CATV receiver input, and passes control to a function block 518. The function block 518, in turn, determines the susceptibility of the first digital channel to intermodulation distortion by comparing the first and total power measurements with known intermodulation distortion characteristics of the CATV receiver.
[0001]Turning to Figure 10, a method for assessing susceptibility of a CATV receiver to intermodulation distortion is indicated generally by the reference numeral 1000. The method 1000 includes a start block 1010a, which passes control to a function block 1012b. The function block 1012 selects a first digital channel from a plurality of channels in a CATV signal, and passes control to a function block 1014c. The function block 1014 determines a first power measurement of the first digital channel at the CATV receiver input, and passes control to a function block 1016. The function block 1016d determines a total power measurement from one or more of the other channels in the CATV signal at the CATV receiver input, and passes control to a function block 1018. Optionally, the method 1000 may further include a function block 1020, which receives control from the function block 1018 and determines a level-versus-frequency signal tilt at the CATV receiver input. In addition, the method 1000 may further include a function block 1022, which receives control from the function block 1020 and uses the level-versus-frequency signal tilt measured at the CATV receiver input to compensate for the differing signal tilt when performing the signal power measurements at a location in the network other than at the original CATV receiver input. The function block 1022 may then pass control to an end block 1024.
[0002]The above and alternate embodiments provide a method and apparatus for measuring and analyzing the signals present at the input of a CATV digital receiver, and thereby determining its susceptibility to intermodulation (IM) distortion. The IM distortion results when the total power received across all digital and analog signal frequencies exceeds by a critical amount the strength of the selected digital signal being demodulated. Technicians can use this diagnostic tool to measure a single digital channel and/or scan all digital channels, and pursue appropriate corrective action for instances in which susceptibility to IM distortion is indicated. Embodiments may also use a level-versus-frequency signal tilt compensation feature, which enables a tester module 100 to evaluate a receiver connected at a different location in the network from that of the tester module.
[0003]Preferred embodiments of the test device 100 of Figure 1 may use a range of 0.05 to 0.06 relative power ratio between the analog video channels and a digital channel in order to predict the likelihood that other devices receiving that digital channel will be impaired by internal intermodulations. Such other devices may be of different types, each having unique specifications stored in a device specification database 322, for example. A tester module 100 may further generate a tilt line for use as the reference power so that the same device will give the same results at different points in the network that have different tilts.
[0004]Although illustrative embodiments have been described herein with reference to the accompanying drawings, it is to be understood that the present disclosure is not limited to those precise embodiments, and that various other changes and modifications may be effected therein by those of ordinary skill in the receiver123 art without departing from the scope or spirit of the present disclosure. All such changes and modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the present disclosure as set forth in the appended claims.
CLAIMS
ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
A method and apparatus are provided for of a receiver to intermodulation distortion of a digital channel, the method including selecting a first digital channel from channels in a composite signal, determining a first power measurement from the first digital channel, determining a total power measurement from other channels in the composite signal, and determining susceptibility of the first digital channel to intermodulation distortion by comparing the first power measurement and the total power measurement with intermodulation distortion characteristics of the receiver. A method and apparatus are provided for testing susceptibility of a receiver to intermodulation distortion of a digital channel, the method including selecting a first digital channel from channels in a composite signal, determining a first power measurement from the first digital channel, determining a. A method and apparatus are provided for testing susceptibility of a receiver to intermodulation distortion of a digital channel, the method including selecting a first digital channel from channels in a composite signal, determining a first power measurement from the first digital channel, determining a total power measurement from other channels in the composite signal, and determining susceptibility of the first digital channel to intermodulation distortion by comparing the first power measurement and the total power measurement with intermodulation distortion characteristics of the receiver total power measurement from other channels in the composite signal, and determining susceptibility of the first digital channel to intermodulation distortion by comparing the first power measurement and the total power measurement with intermodulation distortion characteristics of the receiver.

Acronym use in the specification

This tab shows all possible acronyms (i.e., terms with capitalized letters) identified in the document. Click on terms to search the specification.

Only show problems
Acronym Issues
Acronym Definition in Specification Identified Issues
CATV

Acronym is not defined in text

IM internal intermodulation

Check first letters

RF a frequency

Check first letters

CSO composite second order
CTB composite triple beat
TCP

Acronym is not defined in text

CATV DIGITAL RECEIVER INTERMODULATION SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTER MODULE
BACKGROUND
[0001]The present invention relates to cable television (CATV) receivers. More particularly, the present invention relates to a method and apparatus for measuring the susceptibility to intermodulation distortion of digital CATV receivers.
[0002]Intermodulation distortion generally occurs in a digital receiver, such as a cable modem or set-top box, when the total power of all signals input to the receiver is too high relative to the power of the digital signal desired to be demodulated. However, if the relative power level of the desired digital channel could be increased, the receiver might attenuate all incoming signals and substantially stop the intermodulation distortion from occurring.
[0003]When intermodulation distortion occurs, the receiver must decode errors that are not caused by impairments within the digital channel. Existing test instruments always measure the bit error rate caused by impairments within a digital channel, but not those caused by intermodulation distortions generated within the receiver, such as a cable modem, set-top box, or other consumer-grade receiver. Test instrument receivers may be capable of rejecting relatively high signal amplitude levels that fall outside of the particular frequency range of the digital channel being measured. On the other hand, the receivers used in consumer-grade equipment are typically not so capable. Thus, the test instruments are unable to measure or accurately estimate bit errors caused by intermodulation distortion at a consumer-grade receiver. Therefore, such test instruments will generally fail to report problems that cause impairments in consumer-grade equipment.
[0004]Unfortunately, the difference in amplitude levels between the lowest and highest frequencies carried on a cable is typically not a constant value. A coaxial cable, for example, attenuates higher frequencies. This effect is known as tilt. In order to compensate for attenuation, amplifiers are used to boost the overall signal power. Equalizers may be used in conjunction with the amplifiers so that the net signal boost is greater for higher frequencies, thereby reducing the tilt.
[0005]These and other issues are addressed by a method and apparatus for testing susceptibility of a receiver to intermodulation distortion of a digital channel. Exemplary embodiments are provided.
[0006]An exemplary method of the present disclosure includes selecting a first digital channel from a plurality of channels in a composite signal, determining a first power measurement from said first digital channel, determining a total power measurement from at least one other channel in said composite signal, and determining susceptibility of said first digital channel to intermodulation distortion by comparing said first power measurement and said total power measurement with intermodulation distortion characteristics of said receiver.
[0007]Another exemplary method is provided wherein said receiver comprises a cable television (CATV) receiver. Another exemplary method is provided wherein said first digital channel and said at least one other channel comprise video channels. Yet another exemplary method is provided wherein at least one of said first power measurement or said total power measurement is determined at an input of said receiver.
[0008]Another exemplary method is provided, further comprising determining a level-versus-frequency tilt of said composite signal. Another exemplary method is provided wherein said level-versus-frequency tilt of said composite signal is determined at an input of said receiver. Yet another exemplary method is provided, further comprising compensating for a differing signal tilt when performing at least one of said first or total power measurements at a location different from a location of said receiver by utilizing said level-versus-frequency tilt.
[0009]Another exemplary method is provided wherein said at least one other channel in said composite signal comprises at least one analog channel. Yet another exemplary method is provided wherein said at least one other channel in said composite signal comprises a plurality of analog channels.
[0010]Another exemplary method is provided, further comprising computing a relative power ratio between said first power measurement and said total power measurement. Yet another exemplary method is provided, further comprising using said relative power ratio to predict the likelihood that other devices receiving said first digital channel will be impaired by internal intermodulation distortions.
[0011]Another exemplary method is provided, further comprising generating a tilt line for a plurality of channels in said composite signal to use as a reference power. Yet another exemplary method is provided, further comprising outputting a susceptibility result for said first digital channel in accordance with said reference power so that a same test device will give a same susceptibility result at different points in a network having different tilts.
[0012]An exemplary intermodulation test device is provided for testing susceptibility of a receiver to intermodulation distortion of a digital channel, the device comprising a tuner for selecting a first digital channel from a plurality of channels in a composite signal, a detector in signal communication with the tuner for determining a first power measurement from said first digital channel and determining a total power measurement from at least one other channel in said composite signal, and a controller in signal communication with the detector for determining susceptibility of said first digital channel to intermodulation distortion by comparing said first power measurement and said total power measurement with intermodulation distortion characteristics of said receiver.
[0013]Another exemplary device is provided, further comprising a display in signal communication with the controller for outputting a result indicative of the determined susceptibility of said first digital channel to intermodulation distortion. Yet another exemplary method is provided, the controller comprising a channel selection unit, a channel plan unit, a digital channel measurement unit in signal communication with the channel selection unit and the channel plan unit, another channel measurement unit in signal communication with the channel plan unit, an evaluation unit in signal communication with the digital channel measurement unit, and a results unit in signal communication with the evaluation unit.
[0014]Another exemplary device is provided wherein the evaluation unit is further in signal communication with the other channel measurement unit. Another exemplary device is provided, further comprising a configurable limit unit in signal communication with the evaluation unit. Yet another exemplary device is provided, further comprising a device specification database in signal communication with the evaluation unit.
[0015]Another exemplary device is provided, further comprising a tilt calculator in signal communication with the other channel measurement unit, a tilt reference unit in signal communication with the tilt calculator, and a tilt compensator in signal communication with each of the digital channel measurement unit and the other channel measurement unit, wherein the evaluation unit is in signal communication with both the digital channel measurement unit and the tilt compensator.
[0016]The present disclosure will be further understood from the following description of exemplary embodiments, which is to be read in connection with the accompanying drawings.
[0017]The present disclosure will be described in greater detail with reference to the accompanying drawings, which represent exemplary embodiments thereof, in which:
[0018]Figure 1 is a schematic diagram of an intermodulation testing device in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure;
[0019]Figures 2-4 are a functional diagram of a controller for the testing device of Figure 1 in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure;
[0020]Figure 5 is a graphical diagram of measured powers of analog channels in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure; and
[0021]Figure 6 is a flow diagram for a method of intermodulation susceptibility testing device in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0022]The present disclosure provides a method and apparatus for testing the likelihood that a receiver will be impaired by internal intermodulation (IM) distortions as a result of the power distribution across the channels within the received signal. Preferred embodiments measure the signals present on a cable rather than those present within a digital receiver. The IM distortion itself is generated within a digital receiver when adverse signal conditions are present. Such adverse signal conditions may include power relative to the desired signal at frequencies above and/or below the frequency band containing the desired signal, for example.
[0023]An exemplary embodiment measures the susceptibilities of cable television (CATV) digital receivers to IM distortion. Exemplary embodiments operate by analyzing signal levels to be input to the receivers, either at the receivers or at known or estimated cable lengths upstream from the receivers. Embodiments may compare the highest analog channel amplitude to the lowest digital channel amplitude, compensate for the inherent tilt of typical coaxial cables, evaluate a user-selected channel, or reference tilt and power.
[0024]A system embodiment measures and reports the signal conditions on a CATV network that can cause intermodulation distortions to occur in consumer-grade digital receivers, enabling technicians to identify and correct the problem. The presently disclosed testing device is capable of measuring the tilt at the point of measurement and compensating for the tilt when it computes the susceptibility to intermodulation distortion. The device may be used to evaluate a single digital channel or scan all digital channels and measure the one with the greatest susceptibility to intermodulation distortion, for example.
[0025]As shown in Figure 2, an intermodulation testing device is indicated generally by the network 1000000a. The tester module 100 includes a controller 110, a frequency (RF) tuner 120 connected to the controller, a detector 130 connected to both the controller and the tuner, and a display 140 connected to the controller. The RF tuner 120 is capable of tuning to any channel being broadcast on the CATV network. The detector 130 may include one or more appropriate detectors for measuring the power of analog and/or digital TV channels. The controller 110 may include non-volatile memory for storing both an operating program and configuration data. The display 140 may be as simple as an indicator light or as elaborate as a touch screen for configuring the device, selecting channels, and reporting measurement progress and results.
[0026]controller 110 digital channel measurement block 312 device specification database 322
[0027]Turning to Figure 2A, a method executable by the controller 110 of Figure 1 is indicated generally by the channel 200. The method 200 includes a channel selection block 210, which passes control to a digital channel measurement block 212. The digital channel measurement block receives a channel plan 214, which contains a description of the channels being transmitted on the cable, including frequency and modulation type The digital channel measurement block 212 measures the power of a selected digital channel. For example, one method of measuring the digital channel power is known in the art as Digicheck. Another less accurate method is to measure the power at the center frequency and add a bandwidth compensation factor based on the ratio of digital channel bandwidth to measurement bandwidth. The digital channel measurement block 212 may perform the power measurement periodically in order to update the display with current results.
[0028]
[0029]Another channel measurement block 216 also receives the channel plan 214, and measures the power of all or a subset of the channels being transmitted. The other channel measurement block 216 may measure all the channels, or just those that could substantially contribute to intermodulation distortion. Such other measured channels could be the video carriers of the analog TV channels, for example, since they normally have the highest power. The other channel measurement block 216 may perform only one measurement for each channel, measure all of them periodically, or select a small number with the highest power and measure them periodically in order to update the display with current results.
[0030]An evaluation block 218 is connected to both the digital channel measurement block 212, for receiving measured channel power and frequency, and to the other channel measurement block 216, for receiving measured power versus frequency. The evaluation block 218 compares the power of the digital channel being tested to the power of the other channels and determines whether a device receiving the digital channel is susceptible to intermodulation distortions.
[0031]Different types of evaluations are possible in the evaluation block 218. In a first example, the evaluation block 218 may subtract the digital channel power from the highest of the other channels’ measured powers. If this result is over a threshold value or configurable limit 220, the channel is indicated as susceptible. The degree of susceptibility may be indicated by the amount that the difference exceeds the threshold. In a second example, the evaluation block 218 may sum the measured powers of the other channels to get a total integrated power, and then subtract the digital channel power from this sum.
[0032]As in the first example, the evaluation block compares the value to a threshold to evaluate the susceptibility to intermodulation distortions. In a third example, the evaluation block 218 may consider the capability of a tuner to reject off-frequency signals as a function of frequency or difference in frequency between the digital channel being received and the frequency of the other signal. Here, the evaluation block 218 sums the amount by which the power of any channel other than the digital channel being evaluated exceeds the device’s rejection capability. The sum of these is defined herein as the “total overload power”. As in the first example, the evaluation block compares this value to a threshold to evaluate the susceptibility to intermodulation distortions.Click or tap to enter a date.
digital channel measurement block 212 channel measurement block 216
[0033]In an alternate embodiment, the method may measure the powers of only those channels for which sums and differences of harmonic frequencies of two or three channels falls within the frequency band of the first digital channel. Here, composite second order (CSO) distortion is the sum or difference of two signals or their harmonics, and composite triple beat (CTB) distortion is the sum and/or difference of three signals or their harmonics.
[0034]The controller 110 or tester module 100 of Figure 1 may further evaluate the susceptibility of a single digital channel selected by the user. The tester module may also scan all digital channels and report the susceptibility of each. The tester module may report which channel is most susceptible and the particular susceptibility of only that channel. The TCP tester module may display or otherwise output a susceptibility report or result 224, which may be a pass/fail indicator and/or the degree of susceptibility, displayed either numerically or graphically. The tester module may evaluate susceptibility compared to a reference specification from a device specification database 222, which database may provide overload power versus frequency. The specification may be configurable. The tester module 100 may further contain a database of the susceptibility characteristics of various receiver devices. A user of the tester module could select a device from the database, and the tester module would report its susceptibility.
[0035]The susceptibility result 224 of this exemplary embodiment may be valid for devices connected at or near the same location as the tester nodule. The signal may have a different tilt at other locations.
[0036]Turning now to Figure 3, another method executable by the controller 110 of Figure 1 is indicated generally by the method 300. The method 300 is similar to the system 200; so duplicate description shall be omitted. The method 300 includes extra functional blocks to perform tilt compensation, such as to measure susceptibility at other locations distant from the location of the tester nodule 100.
[0037]The method 300 includes a channel selection block 310, which passes control to a digital channel measurement block 312. The digital channel measurement block receives a channel plan 314. The digital channel measurement block 312 measures the power of a selected digital channel. Another channel measurement block 316 also receives the channel plan 314, and measures the power of at least some of the other channels being transmitted.
[0038]A tilt calculator 326 is connected to the other channel measurement block 316, and provides a tilt reference 330. A tilt compensator 328 is connected to each of the digital channel measurement block 312, the other channel measurement block 316, and the tilt calculator 326 for receiving a current tilt value.
[0039]An evaluation block 318 is connected to both the digital channel measurement block 312 and the tilt compensator 328 for receiving compensated power of other channels. The evaluation block 318 may receive a limit specification or threshold 320 and/or information from a device specification database 322. The evaluation block 318 compares the power and/or compensated power of the digital channel being tested to the compensated powers of the other channels, determines whether a device receiving the digital channel is susceptible to intermodulation distortions, and outputs a corresponding result 324.
[0040]As shown in Figure 4, a plot of measured powers of analog TV channels is generally indicated. The plot 400 includes measured analog signal powers 412, 414, 416, 418, 420, 422, 424, 426, 428, 430, 432, 434, 436 and 438, each at a different carrier frequency. Here, a first frequency span S1 includes the measured powers 412, 414, 416 and 418. A second frequency span S2 includes the measured powers 418, 420, 422, 424, 426 and 428; and a third frequency span S3 includes the measured powers 428, 430, 432, 434 and 436. The tilt calculator 326 of Figure 3 may use these measured powers to compute a slope of a tilt line. A tilt line is a straight line intersecting the measured levels of two of the highest channels such that all other channels have less than or equal to the power at that frequency on the tilt line.
[0041]In the exemplary plot 400, tilt lines L1, L2 and L3 are present. If two or more possible tilt lines are found, exemplary plot 400, the one covering the widest frequency span is used. From the three possible tilt lines, L2 is selected over L1 and L3 because it has the widest frequency span S2. If two or more tilt lines are found having equal frequency spans, the one with less tilt is used. The tilt calculator 326 outputs the slope of the tilt line, but need not calculate nor output the y-intercept.
[0042]A user may assume that the signal has no tilt at the point that subscriber equipment is connected. Alternatively, the user may use the device to measure the actual tilt at the subscriber location. If the actual tilt is used, the device may store it as a reference tilt. If known, the reference tilt value may also be entered into the device without performing a tilt measurement.
[0043]When tilt compensation is used, the device first measures the tilt. It uses the difference between the current tilt and the reference tilt to adjust the measured powers of all channels. The amount of adjustment is given by the equation:
tiltComp(freq) = (refTilt – currentTilt) * (freq – digFreq) (Equation 1)
[0044]In Equation 1, currentTilt is the measured tilt at the current location, refTilt is the tilt at the location of the subscriber’s receiver, freq is the frequency of the channel being adjusted, and digFreq is the frequency of the digital channel for which susceptibility is being evaluated. The adjustment is added to the measured value before passing it on to the evaluation block 318.
[0045]Turning to Figure 5, a method for assessing susceptibility of a CATV receiver to intermodulation distortion is indicated generally by the reference numeral 500. The method 500 includes a start block 510, which passes control to a function block 512. The function block 512 selects a first digital channel from a plurality of channels in a CATV signal, and passes control to a function block 514. The function block 514 determines a first power measurement of the first digital channel at the CATV receiver input, and passes control to a function block 516. The function block 516 determines a total power measurement from one or more of the other channels in the CATV signal at the CATV receiver input, and passes control to a function block 518. The function block 518, in turn, determines the susceptibility of the first digital channel to intermodulation distortion by comparing the first and total power measurements with known intermodulation distortion characteristics of the CATV receiver.
[0001]Turning to Figure 10, a method for assessing susceptibility of a CATV receiver to intermodulation distortion is indicated generally by the reference numeral 1000. The method 1000 includes a start block 1010a, which passes control to a function block 1012b. The function block 1012 selects a first digital channel from a plurality of channels in a CATV signal, and passes control to a function block 1014c. The function block 1014 determines a first power measurement of the first digital channel at the CATV receiver input, and passes control to a function block 1016. The function block 1016d determines a total power measurement from one or more of the other channels in the CATV signal at the CATV receiver input, and passes control to a function block 1018. Optionally, the method 1000 may further include a function block 1020, which receives control from the function block 1018 and determines a level-versus-frequency signal tilt at the CATV receiver input. In addition, the method 1000 may further include a function block 1022, which receives control from the function block 1020 and uses the level-versus-frequency signal tilt measured at the CATV receiver input to compensate for the differing signal tilt when performing the signal power measurements at a location in the network other than at the original CATV receiver input. The function block 1022 may then pass control to an end block 1024.
[0002]The above and alternate embodiments provide a method and apparatus for measuring and analyzing the signals present at the input of a CATV digital receiver, and thereby determining its susceptibility to intermodulation (IM) distortion. The IM distortion results when the total power received across all digital and analog signal frequencies exceeds by a critical amount the strength of the selected digital signal being demodulated. Technicians can use this diagnostic tool to measure a single digital channel and/or scan all digital channels, and pursue appropriate corrective action for instances in which susceptibility to IM distortion is indicated. Embodiments may also use a level-versus-frequency signal tilt compensation feature, which enables a tester module 100 to evaluate a receiver connected at a different location in the network from that of the tester module.
[0003]Preferred embodiments of the test device 100 of Figure 1 may use a range of 0.05 to 0.06 relative power ratio between the analog video channels and a digital channel in order to predict the likelihood that other devices receiving that digital channel will be impaired by internal intermodulations. Such other devices may be of different types, each having unique specifications stored in a device specification database 322, for example. A tester module 100 may further generate a tilt line for use as the reference power so that the same device will give the same results at different points in the network that have different tilts.
[0004]Although illustrative embodiments have been described herein with reference to the accompanying drawings, it is to be understood that the present disclosure is not limited to those precise embodiments, and that various other changes and modifications may be effected therein by those of ordinary skill in the receiver123 art without departing from the scope or spirit of the present disclosure. All such changes and modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the present disclosure as set forth in the appended claims.
CLAIMS
ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
A method and apparatus are provided for of a receiver to intermodulation distortion of a digital channel, the method including selecting a first digital channel from channels in a composite signal, determining a first power measurement from the first digital channel, determining a total power measurement from other channels in the composite signal, and determining susceptibility of the first digital channel to intermodulation distortion by comparing the first power measurement and the total power measurement with intermodulation distortion characteristics of the receiver. A method and apparatus are provided for testing susceptibility of a receiver to intermodulation distortion of a digital channel, the method including selecting a first digital channel from channels in a composite signal, determining a first power measurement from the first digital channel, determining a. A method and apparatus are provided for testing susceptibility of a receiver to intermodulation distortion of a digital channel, the method including selecting a first digital channel from channels in a composite signal, determining a first power measurement from the first digital channel, determining a total power measurement from other channels in the composite signal, and determining susceptibility of the first digital channel to intermodulation distortion by comparing the first power measurement and the total power measurement with intermodulation distortion characteristics of the receiver total power measurement from other channels in the composite signal, and determining susceptibility of the first digital channel to intermodulation distortion by comparing the first power measurement and the total power measurement with intermodulation distortion characteristics of the receiver.

DOCX issues

This tab shows DOCX conversion issues and warnings identified in the document.
DOCX Conversion Issues Suggested Fix

This document contains custom XML (USPTO Error Code 2003).

Run 'Word->File->Inspect Document' operation to remove issues.

The page size of this document exceeds Letter or A4 (USPTO Error Code 2006).

Correct page size to be either Letter or A4.

The orientation of the document is not portrait which may not be rendered correctly by the USPTO (USPTO Error Code 2008).

Set document to portrait orientation.

Document contains fonts unrecognized by the USPTO, such as: "Abadi", "Malgun Gothic", "Angsana New" (USPTO Error Code 2009).

Remove invalid fonts from the document.

Document contains one or more content controls.

Remove all content controls.

Word count in abstract section is over 150 words (USPTO Error Code 3008).

Reduce Abstract length to 150 words or less.

Sequential paragraph numbers were not detected (e.g., [0001] and [0045]) (USPTO Error Code 3007).

Fix paragraph numbering.

Duplicate paragraph numbering has been detected (e.g., [0001]) (USPTO Error Code 3028).

Fix paragraph numbering.

Duplicate paragraph numbering has been detected (e.g., [0002]) (USPTO Error Code 3028).

Fix paragraph numbering.

Duplicate paragraph numbering has been detected (e.g., [0003]) (USPTO Error Code 3028).

Fix paragraph numbering.

Duplicate paragraph numbering has been detected (e.g., [0004]) (USPTO Error Code 3028).

Fix paragraph numbering.

No page numbers were detected (USPTO Error Code 3027).

Add page numbers or they will be added during submission.